All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Test your knowledge! Take our quick quiz before and after you read this article to find out if you improved your knowledge. Results help us to improve content and continually provide open-access education.
The AML Hub has previously covered the 2022 recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) for the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, we summarize the updated guidelines for the management of AML, from the same publication in Blood,1 by Döhner et al. on behalf of the ELN. This article includes a revised response criteria and treatment recommendations.
Alongside the categories outlined in the 2017 version of the recommendations, complete remission (CR) with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) has been introduced as a treatment response option for patients who meet all CR criteria but only have partial recovery of both neutrophils and platelets (Table 1).
Table 1. Treatment response criteria in AML*
Response category |
Definition |
---|---|
CR |
BM blasts <5%; absence of circulating blasts or blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; ANC ≥1.0 × 109/L (1,000/μL); platelet count ≥100 × 109/L (100,000/μL) |
CRh |
ANC ≥0.5 × 109 (500/μL) and platelet count ≥50 × 109/L (50,000/μL), otherwise all other CR criteria met |
CRi |
All CR criteria except for residual neutropenia <1.0 × 109/L (1,000) or thrombocytopenia <100 × 109/L (100,000/μL) |
MLFS |
BM blasts <5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of circulating blasts; absence of extramedullary disease; no hematologic recovery required |
PR |
All hematologic criteria of CR; decrease of BM blast percentage to 5–25%; and decrease of pre-treatment BM blast percentage by ≥50% |
No response |
Patients evaluable for response but who do not meet criteria for CR, CRh, CRi, MLFS, or PR are deemed as having no response prior to the response landmark. Patients who fail to achieve response by the designated landmark are designated as having refractory disease |
Non-evaluable for response |
Patients lack an adequate BM response evaluation, for instance due to early death, withdrawal prior to response assessment, or a technically suboptimal BM sample that precludes assessment |
ANC, absolute neutrophil count; BM, bone marrow; CR, complete remission; CRh, CR with partial hematologic recovery; CRi, CR with incomplete hematologic recovery; MLFS, morphologic leukemia-free state; PR, partial remission. |
Furthermore:
Patients should be monitored closely to manage adverse events, particularly to novel therapeutics. The ELN recommendations for the management of adverse effects of novel agents are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2. Management of selected adverse events for novel agents*
Agent |
AE requiring special attention |
Recommended management |
---|---|---|
FLT3 inhibitors |
||
Midostaurin |
QT prolongation |
Dose interruption/reduction, substitution of QT prolonging co-medication if possible, otherwise additional ECG controls |
Gilteritinib |
Transaminase elevation |
If Grade ≥3, dose interruption/reduction |
QT prolongation |
Dose interruption/reduction, substitution of QT prolonging co-medication |
|
PRES |
Discontinuation |
|
IDH inhibitors |
||
Ivosidenib |
Differentiation syndrome |
Dex, hydroxyurea for co-occurring leukocytosis, dose interruption/reduction |
QT prolongation |
Dose interruption/reduction, substitution of QT prolonging co-medication |
|
Enasidenib |
Differentiation syndrome |
Dex, hydroxyurea for co-occurring leukocytosis, dose interruption/reduction |
Bilirubin elevation |
Dose interruption/reduction |
|
Conjugated antibodies |
||
Gemtuzumab |
Transaminase elevation Bilirubin elevation |
Dose interruption/reduction |
VOD/SOS |
Dose interruption, supportive care, fluid management, possibly defibrotide |
|
BCL-2 inhibitors |
||
Venetoclax |
Neutropenia Thrombocytopenia |
Early response assessment (Day 14–21 of Cycle 1), if BM blasts <5%, cease Ven for up to 14 days to allow count recovery to ≥ CRh. If neutropenia does not recover within 7 days of ceasing Ven, add in G-CSF |
Subsequent cycles: Aza 75 mg/m2 SC/IV Day 1–7 (or Day 1–5 + Day 8–9) or Dec 20 mg/m2 IV Day 1–5 plus Ven 400 mg OD, or LDC 20 mg/m2 SC Day 1–10 plus Ven 600 mg OD q4 weeks until progression |
||
Delayed count recovery or recurrent treatment-emergent Grade 4 neutropenia/thrombocytopenia lasting ≥7 days require reductions in the duration of Ven (from 28 to 21 or 14 days, or less) and/or reductions in Aza, Dec, or LDC dose if severe BM hypoplasia |
||
Tumor lysis syndrome |
Dose ramp-up in Cycle 1; hydration, prophylaxis with uric acid lowering drugs, electrolyte monitoring, and reduction of WBC to <25 × 109/L |
|
Interaction with CYP3A inhibitors |
Moderate CYP3A inhibitors, reduce Ven dose by ≥50%; ramp-up phase: 50 mg on Day 1, 100 mg on Day 2, 200 mg PO OD from Day 3 |
|
Strong CYP3A inhibitors, ramp-up phase: 10 mg on Day 1, 20 mg on Day 2, 50 mg on Day 3, 100 mg (or less) OD PO from Day 4 |
||
Hedgehog pathway inhibitors |
||
Glasdegib |
Muscle spasms |
Dose interruption/reduction |
QT prolongation |
Dose interruption/reduction, substitution of QT prolonging comedication if possible |
|
Chemotherapy |
||
CPX-351 |
Prolonged myelosuppression |
Anti-infectious prophylaxis |
Hypomethylating agents |
||
CC-486/oral |
Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia |
Dose interruption/reduction, myeloid growth factors |
Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea |
Prophylactic anti-emetics |
|
AE, adverse events; Aza, azacitidine; BM, bone marrow; CRh, complete remission with partial hematologic recovery; D, day; Dec, decitabine; Dex, dexamethasone; ECG, electrocardiogram; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IV, intravenous; LDC, low-dose cytarabine; OD, once daily; PO, per oral administration; PRES, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; q4, every four; SC, subcutaneous; SOS, sinusoidal obstructive syndrome; Ven, venetoclax; VOD, veno-occlusive disease; WBC, white blood cell count. |
Recent improvements in technologies and therapies for the management and treatment of patients with AML, and the influence these advancements have had on the standard of care and clinical trials, have informed the 2022 ELN recommendations.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox