TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Should MRD negativity post remission impact treatment decisions in ELN-intermediate risk AML?

By Haimanti Mandal

Share:

Featured:

Jeffrey LancetJeffrey LancetRoland WalterRoland WalterJorge SierraJorge SierraJordi EsteveJordi EsteveGail J. RobozGail J. Roboz

Sep 9, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute myeloid leukemia.


Video series

During a meeting of the AML Hub Steering Committee, held on May 8, 2024, Jeffrey Lancet chaired a discussion on the question: In European LeukemiaNet (ELN) intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), can or should measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment at the end of the treatment supersede baseline molecular risk stratification for determining next steps in treatment, for example, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation? The discussion featured Gail Roboz, Jordi Esteve, Jorge Sierra, and Roland Walter.

Lancet opens the discussion on whether MRD negativity post remission could replace transplantation in non-favorable risk AML settings. With advancements in the treatment landscape, cost concerns, and transplant-related comorbidities, such as graft-vs-host syndrome, some steering committee members supported sparing/delaying transplants for patients achieving MRD-negative remission, particularly after the first cycle of therapy. However, most opposed skipping transplants in intermediate-risk patients, except for specific genetic profiles. Concerns about the sensitivity of MRD measurement tools, especially flow cytometry, were also discussed. The lack of consensus highlights the need for more data and randomized trials.