The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View aml content recommended for you
Video series
During a meeting of the AML Hub Steering Committee, held on May 8, 2024, Jeffrey Lancet chaired a discussion on the question: How can we apply minimal residual disease (MRD) guidelines to low-intensity therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)? The discussion featured contributions from Gail Roboz, Naval Daver, and Uwe Platzbecker.
The steering committee members discuss how MRD negativity can serve as a prognostic tool for guiding treatment decisions in AML, including low-intensity therapy (e.g., hypomethylating agents, venetoclax), maintenance therapy (including gilteritinib), transplantation, treatment modification, and extended drug holidays, in both fit and older/frail patients. The steering committee members highlighted the limitations of existing MRD assessment methods, such as the sensitivity of flow cytometry, assay quality, NPM1, FLT3, NGS PCR assays, and RNA fusion panels. The group also previewed the upcoming European LeukemiaNet risk guidelines on MRD monitoring and potential opportunities to learn about experiences in other diseases, such as acute and chronic lymphoblastic leukemia.