TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

"How I treat” differentiation syndrome associated with differentiating-agent therapy in AML

By Haimanti Mandal

Share:

Apr 11, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute myeloid leukemia.


 

 

Many novel AML therapies exert their antileukemic effects by restoring aberrant leukemogenic differentiation.1 Differentiating agents such as ATRA/ATO, IDH-1FLT3, and menin inhibitors generally cause less myelosuppression and fewer typical chemotherapeutic side effects, such as mucositis and alopecia. However, they are associated with differentiation syndrome (DS; initially termed as retinoic acid syndrome).1

A “how I treat” case series published by Issa et al.1 in Blood discusses management approaches of DS associated with differentiating agents in the treatment of patients with AML. 

 

Key learnings

Early recognition of DS is crucial. The most common manifestations of DS include pulmonary issues (dyspnea, hypoxia, pulmonary infiltrates, and pleural ± pericardial effusions), weight gain, fever, hypotension, and renal insufficiency.

The treatment of DS involves prompt initiation of systemic corticosteroids, with tapering as symptoms resolve. Concurrent cytoreduction with HU, Ara-C, and GO is used to prevent leukostasis, including DIC. In severe DS, targeted therapies should be discontinued until symptoms resolve.

Prophylactic administration of corticosteroids is recommended to prevent/minimize DS in APL, but not outside of APL. Patients with relapsed AML should undergo cytoreduction before initiating targeted therapies to minimize the incidence and severity of DS and leukostasis, including DIC.

Further studies are needed to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms of DS, establish diagnostic criteria specific to novel differentiating agents, and determine optimal therapeutic strategies to further reduce DS-related morbidity and mortality.

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; Ara-C, cytarabine; ATO, arsenic trioxide; ATRA, all-trans retinoic acid; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; DS, differentiation syndrome; GO, gemtuzumab ozogamicin; HU, hydroxyurea. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content