All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
A “how I treat” case series published in Blood by Roboz et al.1 discussed different clinical scenarios involving the use of maintenance treatments in patients with AML. |
Key learnings |
Case 1: A 64-year-old male with adverse-risk AML (ASXL1 and RUNX1 mutations) achieved remission after induction with idarubicin and cytarabine, but remained MRD+ by flow cytometry even after consolidation and could not undergo allo-HSCT due to his clinical condition. Treatment with oral azacitidine led to MRD− CR by Cycle 3. However, given his unfavorable risk profile, long-term remission with oral azacitidine was unlikely, so he subsequently underwent allo-HSCT. |
Case 2: A fit 54-year-old female with NPM1 and SRSF2 co-mutated AML achieved MRD−remission after FLAG-Ida plus GO induction therapy. Despite eligibility, she was keen to avoid allo-HSCT. Consequently, she was treated with two cycles of high-dose cytarabine consolidation, followed by maintenance with oral azacitidine. |
Case 3: A fit 45-year-old male with FLT3-ITD and IDH1-mutated AML underwent induction with 7+3 and gilteritinib, followed by consolidation with high-dose cytarabine and gilteritinib, but remained MRD+. He subsequently underwent allo-HSCT and was placed on gilteritinib maintenance. |
Case 4: A 76-year-old female with congestive heart failure and a history of lung cancer was diagnosed with AML, with IDH2 and DNMT3A mutations detected by NGS. Since she had initially undergone low-intensity induction with Ven-Aza, her maintenance therapy included repeated cycles of Ven-Aza, with dose modifications post-remission. |
The case series supports incorporating post-remission maintenance as part of SoC in AML. Further studies are needed to establish safe discontinuation of maintenance therapies and the routine use of high-sensitivity MRD assays in decision-making. |
Abbreviations: allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; Aza, azacitidine; CR, complete remission; FLAG-Ida, fludarabine, idarubicin, cytarabine; ITD, internal tandem duplication; GO, gemtuzumab ozogamicin; MRD, measurable residual disease; NGS, next-generation sequencing; SoC, standard of care; Ven, venetoclax.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox