All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Syndax, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kura Oncology, and AbbVie. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

FLT3 inhibitors in AML: Current clinical landscape and key insights from trials

By Sari Cumming

Share:

Featured:

Mark J. LevisMark J. Levis

Jun 10, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to discuss the current clinical landscape of FLT3 inhibitors for the treatment of AML.


Do you know... Which of the following statements regarding the use of FLT3 inhibitors in the treatment of AML is incorrect?

The AML Hub was pleased to speak with Mark J. Levis, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, US. We asked, What is the current clinical landscape of FLT3 inhibitors in the treatment of AML, and what insights have been gained from trials so far?

Levis provides an overview of the key FLT3 inhibitors in clinical development for the treatment of FLT3-mutated (FLT3m) AML and discusses ongoing questions, including how to select the most appropriate FLT3 inhibitor for different patient populations and how best to incorporate them into standard treatment regimens. He highlights the value of measurable residual disease (MRD) in monitoring disease status as an important insight from clinical trials.

FLT3 inhibitors in AML: Current clinical landscape and key insights from trials

Key points

  • FLT3 inhibitors are recommended as part of the treatment regimen for patients with FLT3m AML, based on improved clinical outcomes demonstrated in several clinical trials.1–5
  • Four FLT3 inhibitors are currently approved across the world – quizartinib, gilteritinib, midostaurin, and sorafenib – and an ongoing challenge in clinical practice is determining which FLT3 inhibitor might be most appropriate for specific treatment settings, while considering that their availability and regulatory status vary between regions.
  • Incorporating FLT3 inhibitors into less intensive regimens, such as azacitidine + venetoclax, for patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, remains a key unmet need.
  • The optimal integration of FLT3 inhibitors into treatment strategies, including intensive induction regimens and allo-HSCT, has also not yet been fully established.
  • Clinical trials increasingly support the use of MRD assessment to monitor remission status and guide treatment decisions involving FLT3 inhibitors.
  • While substantial progress has been made in establishing FLT3 inhibitors as a key element of care for FLT3m AML, further investigation is required to define optimal treatment strategies for different patient populations.

This educational resource is independently supported by Daiichi Sankyo. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which AML-related topic do you currently need the most practical guidance on?