All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
This article is based on an overview of the International Academy for Clinical Hematology webinar delivered by Bipin Savani on April 1, 2020. It is the second part of a series summarizing the highlights from the Transplantation & Cellular Therapy (TCT) 2020 meeting.
The authors assessed whether improved complete response (CR) with quizartinib would result in an increased number of patients eligible for allogeneic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).
Previous results from the phase III QuANTUM-R study (NCT02039726) demonstrated clinical benefit of quizartinib, a selective FLT3 inhibitor over salvage chemotherapy in patients with FLT3-ITD relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The abstract presented results of post hoc analysis of clinical outcomes in patients who underwent subsequent HSCT. Read about study methods and previous results here.
In total, 85 of 245 patients treated with quizartinib and 19 of 122 patients in the salvage chemotherapy group underwent HSCT. Forty nine patients in the quizartinib arm were continued on the drug after transplantation.
Table 1. A pooled analysis of survival after quizartinib and salvage therapy by transplant status
allo-HSCT, allogeneic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; CI, confidence intervals; OS, overall survival |
||
|
Allo-HSCT (n= 92) |
No HSCT (n= 263) |
---|---|---|
Median OS (95% CI), months |
12.2 (9.9–25.1) |
4.4 (4.1–4.9) |
1-year OS rate (95% CI), % |
50 (39–60) |
13 (9–18) |
2-year OS rate (95% CI), % |
39 (29–50) |
7 (3–011) |
Transplantation rates were higher among patients with FLT3-ITD R/R AML who received quizartinib than those on salvage chemotherapy (32% vs 11%), suggesting enhanced rates of CR rates and reduction of prior-transplant mortality. The results suggest that continuation of quizartinib after allo-HSCT improves survival. However, additional studies are needed to validate these results.
RUNX1 mutations in AML are associated with poor outcomes due to higher rates of chemotherapy resistance and is considered an adverse risk factor according to the European Leukemia Net classification. While there is sufficient evidence to show the negative impact of RUNX1 mutations on outcome after allo-HSCT in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and secondary AML, its impact on outcome after allo-HSCT in patients with de novo AML has not been established.
To address that, the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) conducted a retrospective registry analysis. Data from adult patients undergoing allo-HSCT between the years 2013 and 2018 for AML in first CR, with matched related/unrelated donor were included in the study.
Table 2. Multivariate analysis of factors with a significant impact on patient outcome (p values for the whole cohort)
GRFS, graft-versus-host disease/relapse free survival, LFS, leukemia-free survival; NRM, non-relapse mortality; OS, overall survival; TCD, T cell depletion |
|||||
|
Relapse |
NRM |
LFS |
OS |
GRFS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrelated vs related matched donor |
– |
0.00907 |
0.0293 |
0.0118 |
– |
Age (per 10 year) |
– |
0.00001 |
0.00882 |
0.00932 |
– |
Poor vs intermediate cytogenetics |
0.0219 |
– |
0.00432 |
– |
0.0213 |
Female to male |
– |
0.0232 |
– |
– |
– |
In vivo TCD |
– |
– |
– |
– |
0.0288 |
The results of this retrospective study demonstrated that in contrast to secondary AML and MDS, in patients with de novo AML transplantation in CR1 may overcome the poor prognosis of RUNX1 mutation. It is possible that co-mutations in other genes could modify the impact of RUNX1.
Read about molecular profiling at diagnosis for risk stratification of patients with AML undergoing allo-HSCT in first remission here.
Other important abstracts mentioned in the webinar already covered on the AML Hub are listed in Table 3
Table 3. Other TCT meeting 2020 highlight abstracts
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CIBMTR, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research; CPX-351, cytarabine and daunorubicin; GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; MRC, myelodysplasia-related changes; RIC, risk intensity conditioning; TCT, Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meeting |
|
Abstract title |
Link to the article |
---|---|
Summary TCT 2020 highlights – part 1: Conditioning regimens for AML and MDS |
|
Outcomes in patients with AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) who achieved remission with CPX-351 vs 7+3: phase III exploratory analysis |
|
MLL-rearranged AML is associated with poor outcomes as compared to patients with intermediate and adverse risk disease: A CIBMTR study of 3779 adult patients |
|
Long-Term follow up of BMT CTN0901, a randomised phase III trial comparing Myeloablative (MAC) to reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) prior to HSCT AML or MDS (MAC vs RIC trial) |
https://aml-hub.com/medical-information/long-term-follow-up-from-mavric-trial |
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox