TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Results from a CIBMTR study of patients with MLL-rearranged AML

By Paola Frisone

Share:

Mar 18, 2020


Translocations at chromosome 11q23 involving the MLL gene are present in 3%–4% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Because adult cases of AML with 11q23 abnormalities are rare, there are a lack of studies evaluating the impact of these translocations on patient outcomes.1 During the 2020 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy (TCT) Meeting, Kamal Menghrajani, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,  New York, US, presented the results of a study by Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR)  evaluating the impact of MLL-rearranged AML on post-transplant outcomes as compared to intermediate- and adverse-risk disease.2

Methods2

  • 8,709 adult patients with AML from the CIBMTR database were included
  • Patients transplanted in first complete remission (CR1) were stratified by presence of 11q23 rearrangement, intermediate- or adverse-risk disease
  • Relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed
  • Of the 8,709 eligible patients, 3,779 were selected based on disease and donor type, HSCT in CR1, and availability of data, of these:
    • 426 patients had an 11q23 translocation:
      • t(9;11): 26% (n = 112)
      • t(11;19): 15% (n = 62)
      • t(6;11): 10% (n = 41)
      • t(10;11): 7% (n = 28)
      • 11% (n = 47) had other translocation partners
      • For 32% (n = 136) no translocation partner was provided
    • 2,384 patients had intermediate-risk disease
    • 969 patients had adverse-risk disease

Results2

  • DFS was lowest in adverse-risk patients, hazard ratio (HR) for death:
    • adverse- risk, 1.47 (p < 0.001)
    • MLL, 1.26 (p = 0.002)
  • OS was shorter for the MLL- and adverse-risk groups:
    • adverse-risk, HR = 1.45 (p < 0.001)
    • MLL, HR = 32 (p < 0.001)
  • NRM was worse for patients with adverse-risk disease, with an HR of 1.17 (p = 0.05)
  • Relapse risk was higher for adverse-risk patients:
    • adverse risk, HR = 1.71 (p < 0.001)
    • MLL, HR = 1.27 (p = 0.01)
  • Relapse rates were similar for all translocation partners
  • For patients with measurable residual disease (MRD)-positivity:
    • HR for relapse, 1.23 (p < 0.006)
    • For DFS, HR for death, 1.13 (p = 0.04)

Conclusions2

In adult patients with MLL-rearranged AML, transplanted in CR1:

  • DFS and OS are very similar to patients with adverse-risk disease
  • MRD was a predictor of relapse and DFS, but not of NRM or OS
  • All translocation partners showed very similar relapse rates

All together these results demonstrated that adult patients with MLL-rearranged AML had a poor outcome, similar to patients with adverse-risk disease. New therapeutic approaches are needed for this population.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

More about...