All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Roche and Syndax and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2020-03-18T10:30:24.000Z

Results from a CIBMTR study of patients with MLL-rearranged AML

Mar 18, 2020
Share:

Bookmark this article

Translocations at chromosome 11q23 involving the MLL gene are present in 3%–4% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Because adult cases of AML with 11q23 abnormalities are rare, there are a lack of studies evaluating the impact of these translocations on patient outcomes.1 During the 2020 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy (TCT) Meeting, Kamal Menghrajani, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,  New York, US, presented the results of a study by Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR)  evaluating the impact of MLL-rearranged AML on post-transplant outcomes as compared to intermediate- and adverse-risk disease.2

Methods2

  • 8,709 adult patients with AML from the CIBMTR database were included
  • Patients transplanted in first complete remission (CR1) were stratified by presence of 11q23 rearrangement, intermediate- or adverse-risk disease
  • Relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed
  • Of the 8,709 eligible patients, 3,779 were selected based on disease and donor type, HSCT in CR1, and availability of data, of these:
    • 426 patients had an 11q23 translocation:
      • t(9;11): 26% (n = 112)
      • t(11;19): 15% (n = 62)
      • t(6;11): 10% (n = 41)
      • t(10;11): 7% (n = 28)
      • 11% (n = 47) had other translocation partners
      • For 32% (n = 136) no translocation partner was provided
    • 2,384 patients had intermediate-risk disease
    • 969 patients had adverse-risk disease

Results2

  • DFS was lowest in adverse-risk patients, hazard ratio (HR) for death:
    • adverse- risk, 1.47 (p < 0.001)
    • MLL, 1.26 (p = 0.002)
  • OS was shorter for the MLL- and adverse-risk groups:
    • adverse-risk, HR = 1.45 (p < 0.001)
    • MLL, HR = 32 (p < 0.001)
  • NRM was worse for patients with adverse-risk disease, with an HR of 1.17 (p = 0.05)
  • Relapse risk was higher for adverse-risk patients:
    • adverse risk, HR = 1.71 (p < 0.001)
    • MLL, HR = 1.27 (p = 0.01)
  • Relapse rates were similar for all translocation partners
  • For patients with measurable residual disease (MRD)-positivity:
    • HR for relapse, 1.23 (p < 0.006)
    • For DFS, HR for death, 1.13 (p = 0.04)

Conclusions2

In adult patients with MLL-rearranged AML, transplanted in CR1:

  • DFS and OS are very similar to patients with adverse-risk disease
  • MRD was a predictor of relapse and DFS, but not of NRM or OS
  • All translocation partners showed very similar relapse rates

All together these results demonstrated that adult patients with MLL-rearranged AML had a poor outcome, similar to patients with adverse-risk disease. New therapeutic approaches are needed for this population.

  1. Chen Y. et al. Prognostic significance of 11q23 aberrations in adult acute myeloid leukemia and the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia. 2013 Apr; 27(4):836–42. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.319
  2. Menghrajani K. et al. MLL-Rearranged AML Is Associated with Poor Outcomes As Compared to Patients with Intermediate- and Adverse-Risk Disease: A CIBMTR Study of 3779 Adult Patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Mar 01; 26(3):S10–S11. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.074

More about...

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what is your preferred format for educational content on the AML Hub?
15 votes - 79 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox