All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Syndax, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kura Oncology, and AbbVie. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

IC vs HMA + Ven for ND AML with very high-risk cytogenetic features

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

May 19, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.


Results from a retrospective, multicenter cohort study, comparing intensive chemotherapy (IC) with hypomethylating agent + venetoclax (HMA + Ven) as first-line therapy in 358 patients with newly diagnosed (ND) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring very high-risk cytogenetics (vHRC) and 840 patients with AML without vHRC, were published in Blood Neoplasia by Aguirre et al. The primary endpoint was composite complete remission (cCR) rate, and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Key data: In patients with vHRC, cCR rates were similar with IC (n = 142) vs HMA + Ven (n = 216; 54% vs 55%; p = 0.908), with complete remission (CR) and CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) / CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates of 50% and 3.8% in the IC group vs 32.9% and 21.8% in the HMA + Ven group. In the full population (N = 1,198), median OS was significantly shorter in patients with vHRC vs those without (8.1 vs 31 months; p < 0.0001). Among patients with vHRC, median OS was longer with IC vs HMA + Ven (11.0 vs 6.5 months; p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, older age (p = 0.0003), prior myeloid disease (p < 0.0001), TP53 mutation (p < 0.0001), and inv(3)/t(3;3) (p = 0.0002) independently predicted inferior OS, whereas allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) improved OS (p < 0.0001).

Key learning: In AML with vHRC, HMA + Ven demonstrated comparable remission and survival outcomes to IC, representing a reasonable first-line option for older patients, those with TP53-mutated disease, and those intended for allo-HSCT.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content