All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Syndax, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kura Oncology, and AbbVie. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Pre-transplant HMA + Ven vs IC in older patients with adverse-risk AML

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Apr 29, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute myeloid leukemia.


Results from a retrospective, international cohort study, comparing hypomethylating agents (HMA) + venetoclax (Ven) to intensive chemotherapy (IC) prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) in 139 patients aged 60–74 years with European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), were published in Haematologica by Berton et al. Endpoints included composite complete remission (cCR) rate, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). 

Key data: The cCR rates were 77% and 71%, and ORRs were 91% and 77% in the HMA + Ven and IC groups, respectively. Among responders, 73% and 63% were measurable residual disease (MRD) negative in the HMA + Ven and IC groups, respectively. Post-allo‑HSCT OS (p = 0.636), RFS (p = 0.959), NRM (p = 0.632), and CIR (p = 0.643) did not significantly differ between groups. In multivariable analyses, achievement of a cCR at allo-HSCT was associated with improved survival (p = 0.001), while monosomal karyotype was associated with worse survival (p = 0.003). 

Key learning: Results suggest that HMA + Ven is a feasible pre-transplant induction alternative to IC in older patients with adverse-risk AML; longer follow-up is warranted. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content