All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Syndax, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kura Oncology, AbbVie,  and has been supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group.
Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

HMA + Ven vs IC in ND AML with chromosome 5 and/or 7 abnormalities

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Feb 25, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.


Results from a multicenter retrospective study, comparing hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax (Ven) vs intensive chemotherapy (IC) in 246 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who had chromosome 5 and/or 7 abnormalities (deletion 5 or 5q [−5/del5q] and/or deletion 7 [−7]), were published in Haematologica by Boussi et al. The primary endpoints were measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity rates and overall survival (OS). 

Key data: A total of 85 patients received IC and 161 patients received HMA + Ven. The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate among patients receiving IC was 43% vs 52% in patients receiving HMA + Ven (p = 0.20). Among patients with MRD flow cytometry data, MRD-negativity rates were 50% vs 43% in patients treated with IC (n = 18) vs HMA + Ven (n = 37), respectively (p = 0.77). Patients who received IC had a median OS of 11 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1–16) compared with 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.7–7.8) in patients who received HMA + Ven (p = 0.0013). In a multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis (p = 0.0324), prior myeloid disease (p = 0.0266), monosomal karyotype (p = 0.029), and KRAS mutation (p = 0.0063) were associated with poorer OS, while allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was associated with improved OS (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in OS between patients receiving HMA + Ven vs IC in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.9202).

Key learning: IC and HMA + Ven demonstrated comparable CR and MRD-negativity rates in patients with AML who had chromosome 5 and/or 7 abnormalities, while OS was significantly longer in patients who received IC vs HMA + Ven. Factors including age at diagnosis, prior myeloid disease, monosomal karyotype, KRAS mutation, and allo-HSCT may be useful predictive markers for outcomes with IC and HMA + Ven.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content