All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Syndax, and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View AML content recommended for you
Results from a retrospective analysis examining the incidence and prognostic impact of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations (IDHm) in 1,023 older patients (≥60 years) with newly diagnosed (ND) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were published by Hoff et al. in Haematologica. Eligible patients were enrolled in the phase Ib/II Beat AML trial (NCT03013998). IDHm were detected in 28% of patients, including IDH1m (9.7%), IDH2m (18.9%), and IDH1m + IDH2m (1.0%). The outcome analysis included 1,002 patients, of whom 705 received lower-intensity therapy; among these, 666 were treated with hypomethylating agent (HMA). The outcome analyzed was overall survival (OS).
Key data: The most commonly co-occurring mutations with IDHm were DNMT3A, NPM1, and SRSF2 (p < 0.001 each). Among patients treated with HMA, the median OS was prolonged in patients with IDH2m compared with wild-type IDH (IDHwt) (18.5 vs 10.2 months; p < 0.001). IDH1 was not predictive of survival outcomes, while IDH2 remained prognostic of OS after excluding patients who received IDH inhibitors (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–0.89). Favorable outcomes were observed when IDH co-mutated with a TP53 (p = 0.043) or myelodysplasia-related gene mutation (p = 0.006).
Key learning: IDH2 mutations demonstrate favorable prognosis in older patients with ND AML treated with HMA-based therapy, supporting further investigation of targeted therapy combinations with lower-intensity regimens in this population.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content