All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Syndax, and has been supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Low-intensity therapy (LIT) + venetoclax vs LIT in octa-nonagenarians with newly diagnosed AML

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Oct 2, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute myeloid leukemia.


A retrospective study evaluating the outcomes of 289 octa‐nonagenarians with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated between 2013 and 2023 with low-intensity therapy (LIT) + venetoclax or LIT was published by Senapati et al. in Cancer. Octa‐nonagenarians represent a high-risk group with increased incidence of secondary AML and are ineligible for transplantation.

Key data: Composite complete remission (CRc) and median overall survival (OS) rates were higher in the LIT + venetoclax vs LIT groups (61.7% vs 32.4%; p < 0.001 and 7.7 months vs 5.4 months, respectively). Among the LIT + venetoclax group, the median OS was higher in the favorable- vs adverse-risk groups (10.0 vs 3.0 months). De novo AML, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0/1, and venetoclax therapy were associated with improved OS (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, and p = 0.05, respectively).

Key learning: The findings suggest that LIT + venetoclax vs LIT offers survival benefits for octa-nonagenarians with newly diagnosed AML, particularly in those with favorable genetic risk profiles.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

When choosing treatment for patients with AML, how much is your selection influenced by your personal experience with a treatment’s safety profile?