TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

VALDAC: A prospective study of venetoclax and low-dose cytarabine for MRD and oligoblastic relapse in AML

By Oscar Williams

Share:

Apr 9, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute myeloid leukemia.


Treatment for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a challenge due to reduced efficacy and high rates of complications related to disease-associated cytopenia. There have been promising results with venetoclax plus azacitidine or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) at measurable residual disease (MRD) relapse; however, most studies have been retrospective.

Recently, Tiong et al.1 published results from the phase II VALDAC study (ACTRN12619000746134) in Journal of Clinical Oncology investigating the outcomes of venetoclax + LDAC in patients with AML and either MRD or oligoblastic relapse. Here we summarize the key findings.

Study design1

  • A phase II multicenter prospective study which stratified patients to an MRD or oligoblastic relapse cohort.
  • Venetoclax 600 mg was administered orally, once daily on Days 1–28.
  • LDAC 20 mg/m2 was administered subcutaneously, once daily on Days 1–10.
  • The primary endpoint was MRD/hematologic response within two treatment cycles.
  • Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), stem cell transplant realization, safety, and use of hospital resources.

Key findings1

  • A total of 48 patients were enrolled in the study
    • 26 had MRD relapse
    • 22 had oligoblastic relapse
  • The median follow-up period was 25 and 22 months in the MRD and oligoblastic cohort, respectively.

Efficacy

  • The median time to first MRD response and hematologic response was one treatment cycle in the MRD and oligoblastic cohort, respectively.
  • Response rates after two treatment cycles were comparable between the two cohorts (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Response rates in patients with AML treated with venetoclax + LDAC who had either MRD or oligoblastic relapse*

MRD, measurable residual disease.
*Adapted from Tiong, et al.1
Response in the MRD cohort was defined as an MRD response.
Response in the oligoblastic cohort was defined as a hematologic response (complete remission [CR]/CR with partial hematologic recovery/CR with incomplete recovery).

  • The median OS was not reached in both cohorts.
  • The estimated 2-year OS rate was 67% for the MRD cohort and 53% for the oligoblastic cohort.
  • The estimated 2-year event free survival was 53% for the MRD cohort and 36% for the oligoblastic cohort.
  • Of the 31 eligible patients, 71% proceeded to stem cell transplantation.
    • The median OS post-transplant was not reached for either cohort.

Safety

  • In the oligoblastic cohort, there were more cases of Grade ≥3 anemia and infections compared with the MRD cohort (32% vs 4%; p = 0.02 and 36% vs 8%; p = 0.03, respectively).
  • The number of patients experiencing Grade 4 neutropenia (32% vs 23%), thrombocytopenia, (27% vs 15%) and febrile neutropenia (15% vs 5%) were comparable between the oligoblastic and MRD cohorts.
  • Unplanned hospital admission was experienced by 35% and 59% of patients in the MRD and oligoblastic cohorts, respectively.
  • Three patients in the oligoblastic cohort died during treatment.

Key learnings 

  • The results from this study confirm the safety and promising efficacy of venetoclax + LDAC in patients with AML and either MRD or oligoblastic relapse.
  • This regimen has the advantage of outpatient-based administration, fewer serious complications, and comparable efficacy vs intensive chemotherapy.
  • Future studies should evaluate pretransplant MRD eradication versus directly proceeding to transplant, as well as the ability of MRD-directed therapy to modify disease history compared with treatment at morphological relapse.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content