The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View aml content recommended for you
Treatment for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a challenge due to reduced efficacy and high rates of complications related to disease-associated cytopenia. There have been promising results with venetoclax plus azacitidine or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) at measurable residual disease (MRD) relapse; however, most studies have been retrospective.
Recently, Tiong et al.1 published results from the phase II VALDAC study (ACTRN12619000746134) in Journal of Clinical Oncology investigating the outcomes of venetoclax + LDAC in patients with AML and either MRD or oligoblastic relapse. Here we summarize the key findings.
Figure 1. Response rates in patients with AML treated with venetoclax + LDAC who had either MRD or oligoblastic relapse*
MRD, measurable residual disease.
*Adapted from Tiong, et al.1
†Response in the MRD cohort was defined as an MRD response.
‡Response in the oligoblastic cohort was defined as a hematologic response (complete remission [CR]/CR with partial hematologic recovery/CR with incomplete recovery).
Key learnings |
---|
|
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content