All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Relapse following complete remission (CR) is a significant cause of mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).1 Maintaining remission following chemotherapy remains challenging, and novel strategies to prevent relapse are needed.1,2 Similarly, relapse following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is associated with poor outcomes.3 Maintenance therapies for patients who undergo allo-HSCT can be limited by toxicity towards normal engrafted cells.3
During the 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, several presentations discussed maintenance therapy in patients with AML. Hellstrand.1 and van de Loosdrecht.2 discussed immunotherapy-based maintenance strategies following chemotherapy, and DiPersio.3 highlighted maintenance therapy in the posttransplant setting.
In this phase III trial, 320 patients with AML in remission following chemotherapy and ineligible for allo-HSCT were randomized to receive either histamine dihydrochloride and low-dose interleukin-2 (HDC/IL-2) maintenance therapy or no treatment. Patients in the treatment arm received HDC/IL-2 subcutaneously twice daily for 10 consecutive 21-day cycles over 18 months, with 3 weeks rest in the first three cycles and 6 weeks rest in the last seven cycles; median follow-up was 48 months. Hellstrand.1 presented a post-hoc analysis from this trial, assessing the efficacy of HDC/IL-2 in two subgroups,
In the primary analysis:
In the post-hoc analysis:
Based on these results, HDC/IL-2 is selectively effective at preventing relapse in patients with chemo-responsive AML, normal karyotype AML, and those aged 40–60 years.
The phase II ADVANCE-II trial (NCT03697707) included 20 patients with AML who were in CR but were measurable residual disease (MRD) positive and ineligible for allo-HSCT. Patients received four biweekly doses of vididencel, an allogenic leukemia-derived dendritic cell vaccine, and two booster doses at Weeks 14 and 18. Patients were assessed for MRD at baseline and Weeks 14, 20, and 32. The primary endpoint was MRD response, and secondary endpoints included relapse-free survival (RFS), OS, immunological responses, and safety. Median follow-up was 31.6 months.
Overall, 35% of patients had an MRD response (Figure 1).
Figure 1. MRD Response Rate in the ADVANCE-II trial*
MRD, measurable residual disease.
*Data from van de Loosdrecht.2
MRD, measurable residual disease.
*Data from van de Loosdrecht.2
Table 1. Number of VIR and MRD responses in the ADVANCE-II trial*
Response, n |
No VIR |
1–2 VIR |
≥3 VIR |
---|---|---|---|
MRD response |
0 |
2 |
5 |
Conversion to MRD negativity |
0 |
1 |
4 |
MRD, measurable residual disease; VIR, vaccine-induced response. |
Vididencel vaccination in MRD positive patients in CR resulted in a long-term survival benefit, and MRD response was correlated with survival outcomes. Further studies combining vididencel with other maintenance therapies are warranted.
As covered in our article on updates on maintenance therapy with oral azacitidine from the 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, results from several recent analyses support the use of oral azacitidine maintenance therapy after intensive chemotherapy in adult patients with newly diagnosed AML.
The phase I/II VBP101 trial (NCT04849910) assessed tremtelectogene empogeditemcel (trem-cel; formerly known as VOR33) as a donor allograft for patients aged 18–70 years with CD33+ AML who have an elevated risk of relapse and are candidates for myeloablative conditioning allo-HSCT followed by gemtuzumab ozogamicin posttransplant maintenance therapy. Trem-cel is manufactured from patient-matched donor CD34+ cells and modified by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) gene editing to lack CD33. Following engraftment with trem-cel and recovery, patients received gemtuzumab ozogamicin maintenance therapy in a 3 + 3 dose escalation schedule from 0.5 to 2.0 mg/m2 every 28 days for 4–8 cycles. The primary endpoint was primary neutrophil engraftment by Day 28.
All patients who received trem-cel demonstrated primary neutrophil engraftment. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin at 0.5 mg/m2 as maintenance therapy was well tolerated, and results indicate that gemtuzumab ozogamicin-related myelosuppression was prevented.
Several novel maintenance strategies for both the remission and posttransplant setting were presented at the 65th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, with promising initial results. These novel strategies have the potential to improve the poor outcomes associated with relapse in patients with AML.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox