All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Syndax, and supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View AML content recommended for you
A retrospective study assessed the cytomolecular mechanism of relapse and post-relapse outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received FLT3 inhibitor-containing regimens (N = 272). Findings were published by Arora et al. in the American Journal of Hematology. Patients received FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) including gilteritinib (39%), sorafenib (35%), quizartinib (20%), midostaurin (6%), and crenolanib (0.4%).
Key data: After a median follow-up of 46 months, 80 patients (35% of responders) relapsed. FLT3 mutations were lost at relapse in 47% of patients. Patients who received intensive chemotherapy (IC) + FLT3i or hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax + FLT3i were more likely to show loss of an FLT3 mutation at relapse compared with those who received low-intensity therapy (LIT) + FLT3i without venetoclax (p = 0.05). Emergent non-FLT3 mutations were detected in 50% of relapsed patients, including DNA methylation mutations (21%), RAS pathway mutations (16%), and Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) mutations (13%). Median overall survival (OS) after relapse was 5.5 months.
Key learning: Loss of FLT3 mutations and emergence of non-FLT3 mutations represent common mechanisms of relapse following frontline FLT3i-based therapy in FLT3-mutated AML. Type of frontline regimen and transplantation influenced these patterns. Outcomes after relapse remain poor, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic strategies.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content