All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Visit:
How are new fludarabine conditioning combinations impacting transplant outcomes?
Featured
During the virtual 48th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), the AML Hub spoke with Eleni Gavriilaki, George Papanikolaou General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GR. We asked, How are new fludarabine conditioning combinations impacting transplant outcomes?
How are new fludarabine conditioning combinations impacting transplant outcomes?
Gavriilaki begins by discussing a study presented at EBMT 2022 that explored outcomes of fludarabine + treosulfan, which followed on from previous studies exploring treosulfan. Gavriilaki details the study design and patient population, explaining which comparative therapies were used and why. Finally, Gavriilaki outlines different studies presented at EBMT covering fludarabine combinations for patients with AML and MDS.
Related articles
Newsletter
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox