All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Mutation testing in AML:
What you need to know

with Charles Craddock, Ralph Hills, and Gail Roboz

Wednesday, April 23, 2025
17:30-18:30 BST

Register now

This independent educational activity is supported by Thermo Fisher Scientific. All content is developed independently by the faculty. The funder is allowed no influence on the content.

  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2017-08-03T15:48:13.000Z

FDA grants Vyxeos® (CPX-351) approval for the treatment of t-AML and AML-MRC patients

Aug 3, 2017
Share:

Bookmark this article

On 3rd August 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval to Vyxeos® (CPX-351) liposome injection for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed Therapy-related Acute Myeloid Leukemia (t-AML) or newly diagnosed AML with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes (AML-MRC).1 This approval comes after the New Drug Application submitted for Vyxeos® in April 2017 and the priority review designation granted to Vyxeos® in May 2017, which was reported here.

The FDA approval granted for Vyxeos® (a liposomal formulation of daunorubicin plus cytarabine co-encapsulated at a molar ratio of 1:5) was based on clinical data from the pivotal phase III study (NCT01696084), which evaluated the safety and efficacy of Vyxeos® compared to cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) in patients with newly diagnosed t-AML and AML-MRC.

In total, 309 newly diagnosed t-AML and AML-MRC patients (60–75 years) were randomized to receive either Vyxeos® (n = 153) or 7+3 (cytarabine and daunorubicin, n = 156) induction therapy. The endpoints of the study were Overall Survival (OS), Event Free Survival (EFS), and Complete Remission plus Complete Remission with Incomplete blood count recovery (CR+CRi). 2

The key results of the study were:

  • Median OS in patients receiving Vyxeos® and 7+3; 9.56 vs 5.95 months, HR = 0.69, P = 0.005
  • EFS was superior in patients receiving Vyxeos® compared to 7+3; HR = 0.74, P = 0.021
  • CR+CRi response in patients receiving Vyxeos® and 7+3; 47.7% vs 33.3%, P = 0.016

Prof. Jeffrey Lancet, Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Florida, USA, one of the investigators of this pivotal phase III study highlighted in an interview with AGP that the “very difficult to treat subgroup of patients with t-AML” seemed to “benefit proportionally from CPX-351 compared to 7+3” which he said was “gratifying”.

  1. FDA News Release: FDA approves first treatment for certain types of poor-prognosis acute myeloid leukemia. 2017 Aug 3. https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm569883.htm [Accessed 2017 Aug 3].
  2. Lancet J.E. et al. Final results of a phase III randomized trial of CPX-351 versus 7+3 in older patients with newly diagnosed high risk (secondary) AML. Oral Abstract #7000. American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting 2016.

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with acute myeloid leukemia do you see in a month?
2 votes - 22 days left ...

Related articles

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox