All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Targeted therapies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) focus on druggable mutations, such as IDH1/2 and FLT3. These drugs have limited activity as monotherapy, and are therefore often used in combination with chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents (HMAs).
Currently, new treatment paradigms for patients with AML are emerging, where targeted therapies increasingly complement the use of more conventional, chemotherapy-based approaches according to the molecular profile. Although targeted therapies have advanced the treatment for patients with AML, they also come with specific side effects. This month, the AML Global Portal (AGP) is focusing on providing educational content surrounding druggable mutations, and how targeted therapies can be used as effective treatment regimens for AML.
Here are some of the highlights of content the AML Global Portal has recently covered on the topic:
What is the clinical value of new drugs in AML?
At EHA 2019, Prof. Ossenkoppele stated these are exciting times for hematologists working in the AML field. Novel drugs, gilteritinib and quizartinib, were highlighted as potential options to meet an urgent medial of relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML, as was venetoclax, which was described by Prof. Ossenkoppele as "a game changer" in AML.
Why does FLT3 testing need to be performed?
At EHA 2019, Jorge Sierra described how FLT3 mutations are one of the most common molecular abnormalities in AML. He stressed the importance of testing patients for FLT3 mutations because there are FLT3-targeting agents available, such as midostaurin, and because the presence of FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) confers an adverse prognosis.
FLT3 mutations occur in approximately 30% of patients with AML and are often associated with poor survival. Gilteritinib was recently approved by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with R/R AML based on interim data from the randomized phase III ADMIRAL study (NCT02421939). This showed that the oral FLT3 inhibitor, gilteritinib provides superior response and overall survival (OS) compared with salvage chemotherapy (SC) in patients with FLT3 mut+ R/R AML.
Approximately 25% of patients with AML have FLT3-ITD mutations and survival is often inferior due to high relapse rates and short remission periods. Since the standard therapy is challenging for patients with FLT3-ITD AML who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), sorafenib, as monotherapy or in combination, has recently been suggested to be an option for SC.
What effect does gilteritinib have on FLT3 mutated relapsed/refractory AML?
At the 24th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA), Alexander Perl from the University of Pennsylvania, US, presented the data from the ADMIRAL phase III trial of gilteritinib, a selective FLT3 inhibitor, for R/R AML. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either gilteritinib or one of four standard SC treatments. The favorable outcomes of gilteritinib observed in this trial (increased complete response rate (CRR) and overall survival (OS)) led to its FDA approval for R/R AML.
Impact of genetic mutations in gilteritinib treated patients with FLT-3 mutated R/R AML
At the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting in Chicago, US, Mark J. Levis, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, US discussed an abstract based on the impact of co-mutations and FLT-3 allelic burden on the outcome of patients treated with gilteritinib in the randomized ADMIRAL study (NCT02421939). Dr. Levis explained that in this follow-up study, the FLT3 inhibitor, gilteritinib, showed superior response and overall survival (OS) compared with SC in patients with FLT3 mut+ R/R AML. Dr. Levis analyzed the impact of baseline co-mutations and FLT3-ITD allelic ratio (AR) on response and OS.
The presence of FLT3-ITD in AML is a marker of poor prognosis, and when patient relapse with FLT3-ITD AML, there is a high unmet need for effective therapies. Quizartinib monotherapy in comparison with SC, was studied in a phase III trial. Researchers observed that quizartinib was well tolerated and prolonged OS compared with SC.
The FDA decided not to grant approval to quizartinib for the treatment of patients with FLT3-ITD-+ R/R AML, as results of a trial failed to show that the benefits of the treatment outweigh the risks. A final decision is set to be made by the FDA this month, before August 25 2019.
Whilst IDH mutations are not the most commonly occurring aberrations in AML, approximately 20% of patients have mutant IDH (mIDH) genes with approximately 8% affecting IDH1 and 12% in IDH2. These mutations are early events, with 20% of IDH1 and 35% of IDH2 occurring at diagnosis. However, these can also be acquired during progression from myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasms to AML in 10–15% and 20–25% of cases, respectively.
An open-label, multicenter study has led to the approval of ivosidenib for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML with a susceptible IDH1 mutation. Despite patients undergoing side effects, 42.9% achieved complete remission (CR), or CR with partial hematologic recovery.
This phase I/II trial evaluated enasidenib in adults with IDH2-mutated AML that had relapsed after allo-HSCT. Due to the results of the study, the IDH inhibitor is now being studied in a phase III trial of older patients with late-stage, IDH2-mutated, R/R AML.
BCL-2 as a universal target in AML
Dr. Konopleva explains how BCL-2 has become a very important target in AML, specifically using the example of venetoclax, in combination with HMAs, which was approved by the FDA prior to the completion of the phase III trial and became the standard of care in the US for the treatment of unfit elderly patients.
Activity of venetoclax-based therapy in TP53-mutated AML
Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD Anderson Cancer Center, talks to the AGP at ASCO 2019, Chicago, US, about the use of venetoclax in combination with HMAs; FLAG-Ida, low-dose Ara-C or CPX-351 for TP53-mutated AML.
Venetoclax was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML, or for patients who have comorbidities, in combination with HMAs or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). First indicated for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), it is a potent, selective B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor.
This article highlights the clinical impact of venetoclax in potential therapy combinations, discussed possible mechanisms of resistance and ways to overcome them, as well as the future of ventoclax and other BH3 mimetics in AML.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox