All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Roche and Syndax and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
In the December 2017 issue of the American Journal of Hematology, Courtney D. DiNardo from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, TX, and colleagues published results of their study, which aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of venetoclax (VEN [an oral, selective BCL2 inhibitor]) combination strategies in the salvage setting in patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and/or associated myeloid malignancies including Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm (BPDCN).
In total, 43 patients (median age = 68, range, 25–83 years) with R/R AML (n = 39), MDS (n = 2) or BPDCN (n = 2), who were treated with VEN salvage combination regimens between 10 June 2016 and 6 July 2017 at the MDACC were analyzed in this study. Patients received ≥ 14 Days of VEN with either Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs), azacitidine (n = 8) or decitabine (n = 23) or Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC [n = 8]) or other (n = 4).
In summary, this is the first study to report on the “effectiveness of VEN combination strategies for R/R myeloid population”. The authors stated that their findings demonstrate that low-dose chemotherapy either with HMAs or LDAC, in combination with VEN is a “viable salvage treatment” and provides an alternative therapy option for patients with R/R AML, MDS, and BPDCN. Moreover, responses were observed in patients with diploid/intermediate cytogenetics, RUNX1, and/or IDH1/2 mutations.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox