The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View aml content recommended for you
CD123 is commonly overexpressed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).1 Pivekimab sunirine is a novel antibody-drug conjugate comprising a high affinity CD123 antibody.1
Here, we summarize the results from a phase I/II dose escalation and dose expansion trial (NCT03386513) investigating the safety and antileukemic activity of pivekimab sunirine in relapsed/refractory AML published by Daver et al.1 in The Lancet Oncology.
Figure 1. A TEAEs Grade ≥3 and B serious TEAEs occurring in ≥5% of patients treated with the RP2D of pivekimab sunirine *
RP2D, recommended phase II dose; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
*Adapted from Daver, et al.1
Table 1. Efficacy endpoints of patients enrolled in dosing Schedule A and those treated with the RP2D of pivekimab sunirine *
Efficacy endpoint, % (unless otherwise stated) |
Schedule A |
RP2D |
---|---|---|
ORR |
16 |
21 |
Complete remission |
3 |
3 |
Composite complete remission rate |
12 |
17 |
Median duration of ORR, months |
2.0 |
2.6 |
Median duration of composite complete remission, months |
2.2 |
2.3 |
Estimated median OS, months |
2.99 |
5.85 |
ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; RP2D, recommended phase II dose. |
Key learnings |
---|
|
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content