All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Syndax, and has been supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Prognostic implications of NPM1 co-mutation in FLT3-TKD-mutated AML: A retrospective study

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Sep 22, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute myeloid leukemia.


 

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors have improved the outcomes in patients with FLT3-internal tandem duplication-mutated (FLT3-ITDmut) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In contrast, the effects of FLT3-tyrosine kinase domain mutations (FLT3-TKDmut) in AML remain inadequately understood. 

The characteristics and outcomes of patients with FLT3-TKDmut AML, including their responses to intensive chemotherapy (IC) or low-intensity therapy (LIT), and the prognostic impact of NPM1 co-mutations, were assessed in a retrospective cohort study. Results were published by Arora et al. in Cancer.

The study consisted of an FLT3-TKDmut cohort (n = 124) and an NPM1mut/FLT3-TKD wild-type (FLT3-TKDwt) cohort (n = 126). In the FLT3-TKDmut cohort, 54 patients received IC, while 70 patients received LIT. In the NPM1mut/FLT3-TKDwt cohort, 46 patients received IC, while 80 patients received LIT. Responses were assessed using the International Working Group criteria.

 

Key learnings

In the FLT3-TKDmutIC cohort, the CRc and 3-year OS rates were 81% and 56%, respectively. Patients with NPM1mut vs NPM1wt had a higher 3-year OS (74% vs 40%; HR, 0.4; p = 0.03) and 3-year EFS (65% vs 42%; HR, 0.4; p = 0.046).

In patients with NPM1wt vs those with an NPM1 mutation in the IC cohort, allo-HSCT showed improved 3-year OS (89% vs 30%; p = 0.02). In the LIT cohort, allo-HSCT showed improved 3-year OS in patients with NPM1wt vs NMP1mut AML (75% vs 27%; p = 0.1). 

The CRc and 3-year OS rates were 63% and 23%, respectively, in the FLT3-TKDmut LIT cohort. Patients with NPM1mut vs NPM1wt showed a higher 3-year OS (32% vs 16%; p = 0.04).  

NPM1 co-mutations are commonly harbored in patients with FLT3-TKDmut AML, with key prognostic implications. A lack of NPM1 co-mutations is associated with poor response rates and outcomes, and allo-HSCT should be strongly considered for patients in first remission.

allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CRc, composite complete remission; EFS, event-free survival; FLT3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; FLT3-ITD, FLT3 internal tandem duplication; FLT3-TKD, FLT3-tyrosine kinase domain; HR, hazard ratio; IC, intensive chemotherapy; LIT, low-intensity therapy; mut, mutated; NPM1, nucleophosmin 1; OS, overall survival; wt, wild-type.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

When choosing treatment for patients with AML, how much is your selection influenced by your personal experience with a treatment’s safety profile?