All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Kura Oncology, Syndax, Abbvie, Thermo Fisher and Johnson & Johnson. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View AML content recommended for you
Results from a retrospective study evaluating the impact of re-induction chemotherapy and age-adapted consolidation strategy on relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and post-transplant survival in 279 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were published in Blood Cancer Journal by Bolarinwa et al. Re-induction was required to achieve complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) in 72 patients based on residual bone marrow blasts on Day 14 (n = 53) or Days 21–28 (n = 15), persistent extramedullary disease (n = 2), or circulating blasts (n = 2). Consolidation strategies consisted of an anthracycline-based regimen (n = 84), high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC; n = 99), or intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC; n = 58).
Key data: At median transplant-censored follow-up of 26 months, median RFS was 14 months in patients requiring re-induction vs 22 months in those who did not (p < 0.01), while median OS was 37 months vs 106 months, respectively (p < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, the need for re-induction to achieve CR/CRi independently predicted relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; p = 0.01) and inferior OS (HR, 2; p = 0.02). Among patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), median post-transplant survival did not differ between those requiring re-induction and those who did not (61 months vs 76 months; p = 0.6). Among patients aged ≥65 years, IDAC (n = 36) was associated with longer median RFS (23 months vs 8 months; p < 0.01) and OS (40 months vs 12 months; p < 0.01) vs the anthracycline-based regimen (n = 25) as the first consolidation treatment cycle. Among patients aged <65 years, median RFS (p = 0.3) and median OS (p = 0.07) did not differ across all consolidation strategies, although median OS was superior with the anthracycline-based regimen (not reached [NR]) vs HiDAC (85 months; p = 0.02).
Key learning: In this study, the need for re-induction to achieve CR/CRi was independently associated with shorter RFS and OS, but not with post-allo-HSCT survival, in patients with AML, supporting early transplant consideration in these patients. First-cycle consolidation outcomes varied by age, supporting further evaluation of age-adapted consolidation strategies in AML.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.