All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase III study of omidubicel in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies meets all 3 secondary endpoints

By Sumayya Khan

Share:

Oct 7, 2020


On October 6, 2020, positive topline secondary endpoint data were released from the randomized, multicenter, phase III omidubicel study (NCT02730299) in 125 patients with high-risk hematological malignancies. In May, the AML Hub reported on the results regarding the primary endpoint of this international study, which showed that treatment with omidubicel significantly reduced the median time to neutrophil engraftment by 10 days compared to standard umbilical cord blood transplant (p < 0.001). It was generally well tolerated, with a higher percentage of patients achieving successful neutrophil engraftment.1,2

In the new announcement, all three secondary endpoints have shown a statistically significant improvement for patients treated with omidubicel compared to the comparator group.1 These secondary endpoints were:

  • The proportion of patients who achieved platelet engraftment by Day 42,
  • The proportion of patients with Grade 2/3 bacterial or invasive fungal infections in the first 100 days posttransplant, and
  • The number of days alive and out of hospital in the first 100 days posttransplant.

The full data sets are due to be presented at a medical meeting by the end of the year, as well as submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a biologics license. The positive primary and secondary endpoints of this study show omidubicel to be a promising treatment for patients who do not have a matched related donor of suitable age.         

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Approximately what proportion of your patients with FLT3-mutations also have NPM1 and DNMT3A co-mutations?