All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Positive results from a phase III study of omidubicel, a cell therapy product of expanded umbilical cord blood (UCB) cells, (NCT02730299) have been announced.1 The study investigated the safety and efficacy of omidubicel, compared to standard UCB transplant, in patients with high-risk hematological malignancies without a suitable matched donor.2
Top-line results from the study demonstrated that treatment with omidubicel significantly reduced the median time to neutrophil engraftment by 10 days compared to standard UCB transplant (p < 0.001) and was generally well tolerated. Furthermore, a greater percentage of patients achieved successful neutrophil engraftment compared with patients in the comparator group (96% vs 88%, respectively).1
Full efficacy and safety results are expected to be presented later this year, and a biologics license application is due to be submitted to the FDA by the end of the year.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox