All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2018-08-15T13:47:26.000Z

Long-term results from the phase III randomized study of attenuated arsenic trioxide and ATRA for patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia

Aug 15, 2018
Share:

Bookmark this article

The randomized NCRI AML17 Trial compared a standard chemotherapy-based regimen of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus anthracycline (AIDA) to a chemotherapy-free approach consisting of attenuated schedule of arsenic trioxide (ATO) plus ATRA in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). In this study, 235 patients (median age = 47 years, range, 16–77) with APL were randomized 1:1 to receive either ATRA plus idarubicin (n = 119) or ATRA plus ATO (n = 116). Previously published data from this study showed that ATRA and arsenic trioxide is a feasible treatment in low-risk and high-risk patients with APL, with a high cure rate and less relapse than ATRA and idarubicin, with a low incidence of liver toxicity. However, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the ATO plus ATRA and AIDA arms.1

In a Letter to the Editor of Blood, a group of researchers from the UK National Cancer Research Institute Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Working Group reported the long-term results for randomized patients and for 32 patients who received the same schedule of ATO + ATRA after relapsing from the AIDA arm in the NCRI AML 17 trial. The primary objective of this updated analysis was to ascertain whether an overall survival benefit for the ATO+ATRA over the chemotherapy-based regimen has emerged.2

Treatment

  • AIDA arm:
    • Course 1: idarubicin (12 mg/m2) on day 2, 4, 6, 8 plus ATRA (45 mg/m2/d in two divided doses) to day -60
    • Course 2: Idarubicin 5 mg/m2 on day 1–4 plus ATRA on day 1–15
    • Course 3: Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 on day 1–5 plus ATRA on day 1–15
    • Course 4: Idarubicin 12 mg/m2 dl plus ATRA on day 1–15
  • ATO plus ATRA arm:
    • ATO: 8-week induction 0.3 mg/kg, day 1–5 on week 1, 0.25 mg/kg x 2/w on week 2–8, followed by 4 consolidation courses of 0.3 mg/kg on day 1–5 on week 1, 0.25mg/kg x 2/w, on week 2–4 (63 ATO doses)
    • ATRA: 45 mg/m2 in two divided doses

Key findings for randomized patients:

  • Median follow-up time: 67.4 months
  • 5-year OS in the ATO plus ATRA and AIDA arm: 92% vs 86%, HR = 0.71 (0.21–1.34), P = 0.4
  • 5-year Molecular relapse-free survival among patients who became MRD negative after consolidation therapy in the ATO plus ATRA and AIDA arm: 97% vs 78%, HR = 0.25 (0.12–0.52), P = 0.0002
  • No molecularly negative patients treated in the ATO plus ATRA arm relapsed
  • 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse in patients in the ATO plus ATRA and AIDA arm: 1% vs 10%, HR = 0.43 (0.18–1.03), P = 0.005
  • 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) in the ATO plus ATRA and AIDA arm: 96% vs 86%, HR = 0.43 (0.18–1.03), P = 0.06

Key findings for 32 patients who relapsed following AIDA therapy and treated with attenuated ATO schedule:

  • Median follow-up: 44.9 months
  • 5-year OS: 88%
  • All patients achieved molecular complete remission

In summary, the combination of ATO and ATRA continues to show a very low risk of relapse irrespective of risk group with a significantly superior RFS, however, no OS benefit emerged over AIDA.

  1. Burnett A. K. et al. Arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid treatment for acute promyelocytic leukaemia in all risk groups (AML17): results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16: 1295-305. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00193-X. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
  2. Russell N. H. et al. Attenuated arsenic trioxide plus ATRA therapy for newly diagnosed and relapsed APL: long-term follow-up of the AML17 trial. Blood. 2018 Aug 10. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-05-851824. [Epub ahead of print].

Your opinion matters

Do you intend to implement next-generation sequencing for measurable residual disease monitoring in MDS patients?
1 vote - 2 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox