All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Syndax, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kura Oncology, AbbVie, and has been supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group.
Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View AML content recommended for you
A retrospective, multicenter Italian study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC) consolidation after achieving composite complete response (CRc) with ≥1 induction cycle of CPX‑351, a liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin, in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (s‑AML; N = 47). Results were published in Annals of Hematology by Perrone et al.
Key data: At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, median overall survival (OS) was 21 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5–30.4), with 85% and 48.4% of patients alive at 12 and 24 months, respectively. The median event-free survival (EFS) was 14.9 months (95% CI, 11.7–28.2 months). Multivariate analysis identified adverse-risk disease per the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 classification (hazard ratio [HR], 4.32; 95% CI, 1.05–17.71; p = 0.042) and measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity prior to IDAC treatment (HR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.18–7.49; p = 0.021) as independent negative predictors of OS. Adverse events (AEs) of any grade occurred in 57% of patients; most cases were infections, and no toxic deaths were reported.
Key learning: These Italian real-world data show IDAC may be a feasible consolidation strategy with a manageable safety profile following CPX‑351 induction in patients with s‑AML, while adverse-risk disease and pre‑IDAC MRD positivity were negative prognostic factors. Findings warrant further prospective investigation of IDAC consolidation in this population.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content