All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2023-01-03T12:31:23.000Z

What do real-world data tell us about outcomes with venetoclax/HMA vs 7+3 chemotherapy?

Bookmark this article

During the 64th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the AML Hub was pleased to speak to Andrew Matthews, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, US. We asked, What do real-world data tell us about outcomes with venetoclax/hypomethylating agents (HMA) vs 7+3 chemotherapy?

What do real-world data tell us about outcomes with venetoclax/HMA vs 7+3 chemotherapy?

Matthews discusses a national, multicenter, retrospective study comparing venetoclax/HMA and 7+3 chemotherapy in patients aged 60–75 years, newly diagnosed with AML, and without major heart failure or chronic kidney disease, spanning all risk groups and mutational profiles. Matthews outlines the differences in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups and highlights that although adverse events were more common in patients who received intensive chemotherapy, overall survival was significantly longer compared with those who received venetoclax/HMA.

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox