All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Roche and Syndax and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
On 30th August 2017, in an article published in Leukemia Research, Kelly J. Norsworthy from John Hopkins University, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA, et al. reported results of their retrospective study of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients who were treated with Timed Sequential Therapy (TST) based induction therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy or Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT).
TST is a therapeutic strategy that exploits the leukemia cell cycle kinetics by administering a second drug in close approximation with the leukemia proliferation induced by the first drug.
In total, 301 newly diagnosed non-trial AML patients (median age = 52 years) who were treated at John Hopkins Hospital between 2004–2013 were enrolled in this study. Patients were treated with TST with cytarabine, daunorubicin or idarubicin, and etoposide (AcDVP16 or AcIVP16) followed by consolidation chemotherapy alone or BMT. Consolidation chemotherapy consisted of either High Dose cytarabine (HiDAC) or cytarabine and daunorubicin (AcDAC).
In summary, TST was feasible and offers favorable CR rate, OS and DFS in a “non-clinical trial population with manageable toxicities which is also comparable to rates seen in clinical trials”.
Additionally, “TST can provide long-term survival when followed by consolidation chemotherapy using either HiDAC or AcDAC”.
Timed sequential therapy (TST) aims to improve outcomes in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) by harnessing drug-induced cell cycle kinetics of AML, where a second drug is timed to coincide with peak leukemia proliferation induced by the first drugs. We analyzed outcomes in 301 newly diagnosed AML patients treated from 2004–2013 with cytarabine, anthracycline, and etoposide TST induction. Median age was 52 (range 20–74) and complete remission rate 68%. With median follow-up 5.8 years, 5-year DFS and overall survival (OS) were 37% (95% CI 31–45%) and 32% (95% CI 27–38%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, older age, unfavorable cytogenetics, and WBC ≥ 50 × 109/L resulted in worse OS. Among patients not undergoing blood and marrow transplant, a propensity score analysis, which reduces imbalance in baseline characteristics, showed consolidation with TST compared with 1 or more cycles high-dose cytarabine trended toward lower DFS and post-remission survival with hazard ratio (HR) 1.9 (95% CI 0.9–4.0), and 1.6 (95% CI 0.7–3.6), respectively. Our results demonstrate the efficacy and feasibility of TST induction for newly diagnosed patients with AML, with results comparable to that seen in clinical trials with other TST therapies and 7 + 3.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox