All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2017-06-23T11:26:23.000Z

The prognostic significance of monosomal karyotype/ complex karyotype in AML

Jun 23, 2017
Share:

Bookmark this article

In adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients, the presence of Monosomal Karyotype (MK) and Complex Karyotype (CK) is associated with adverse prognosis. However, the prognostic value of monosomy 5, monosomy 7 or monosomy 17 is not clearly defined yet in AML, hence the rationale for this study.

In an article published in Leukemia Research, Stephen A Strickland, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, U.S., and colleagues retrospectively studied the prognostic utility of monosomies including monosomy 5, monosomy 7 and monosomy 17 and karyotype complexity  in patients with MK AML.

In total, 1,592 AML patients who were enrolled between 1990–2008 in four prospective Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer (ECOG-ACRIN) therapeutic trials were included in this study. Cytogenetic data were evaluable in 1,188 patients. Of these 1,188 patients, MK was identified in 195 patients with 93% (182/195) having karyotype complexity (defined as patients with ≥ 3 clonal abnormalities). 87% (158/182) of MK patients with CK had ≥ 5 clonal abnormalities.

The key results of the study were:

  • Median Overall Survival (OS) in patients with or without MK with karyotype complexity ≤ 4 clonal abnormalities; 0.3 vs 1.0 years, HR = 1.98, P < 0.001
  • There was no significant difference in the median OS in patients with or without MK with karyotype complexity ≥ 5 clonal abnormalities; 0.5 vs 0.4 years, HR = 1.06, P = 0.82
  • The presence of monosomy 5 in MK patients with karyotype complexity ≤ 4 clonal abnormalities significantly associated with poor OS; HR 4.13, P = 0.062
  • Median OS in MK patients with karyotype complexity ≤ 4 clonal abnormalities with or without monosomy 17; 0.1 vs 0.4 years, HR 3.11, P = 0.058
  • Median OS in MK patients with karyotype complexity ≥ 5 clonal abnormalities with or without monosomy 17; 0.4 vs 0.5 years, HR 1.53, P = 0.01
  • The presence of monosomy 7 had no impact on OS in MK patients with karyotype complexity ≤ 4 or ≥ 5 clonal abnormalities

 In summation, the “prognostic utility of MK+ is limited to those with less complex karyotype (complexity ≤ 4)”. Additionally, the presence of monosomy 17 in can “independently predict worse survival” in MK AML patients.

 Abstract

The presence of a monosomal karyotype (MK+) and/or a complex karyotype (CK+) identifies subcategories of AML with poor prognosis. The prognostic significance of the most common monosomies (monosomy 5, monosomy 7, and monosomy 17) within MK+/CK+AML is not well defined. We analyzed data from 1,592 AML patients age 17-93 years enrolled on ECOG-ACRIN therapeutic trials. The majority of MK+ patients (182/195; 93%) were MK+/CK+ with 87% (158/182) having ≥5 clonal abnormalities (CK≥5). MK+ patients with karyotype complexity ≤4 had a median overall survival (OS) of 0.4y compared to 1.0y for MK- with complexity ≤4 (p<0.001), whereas no OS difference was seen in MK+vs. MK- patients with CK≥5 (p=0.82). Monosomy 5 (93%; 50/54) typically occurred within a highly complex karyotype and had no impact on OS (0.4y; p=0.95). Monosomy 7 demonstrated no impact on OS in patients with CK≥5 (p=0.39) or CK≤4 (p=0.44). Monosomy 17 appeared in 43% (68/158) of CK≥5 patients and demonstrated statistically significant worse OS (0.4y) compared to CK≥5 patients without monosomy 17 (0.5y; p=0.012). Our data suggest that the prognostic impact of MK+ is limited to those with less complex karyotypes and that monosomy 17 may independently predict for worse survival in patients with AML.

  1. Strickland S. A. et al., Independent Prognostic Significance of Monosomy 17 and Impact of Karyotype Complexity in Monosomal Karyotype/Complex Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results from Four ECOG-ACRIN Prospective Therapeutic Trials. Leuk Res. 2017 May 12. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.05.010. [ Epub ahead of print].

Your opinion matters

Do you intend to implement next-generation sequencing for measurable residual disease monitoring in MDS patients?
1 vote - 3 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox