All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Roche and Syndax and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
In adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients, the presence of Monosomal Karyotype (MK) and Complex Karyotype (CK) is associated with adverse prognosis. However, the prognostic value of monosomy 5, monosomy 7 or monosomy 17 is not clearly defined yet in AML, hence the rationale for this study.
In an article published in Leukemia Research, Stephen A Strickland, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, U.S., and colleagues retrospectively studied the prognostic utility of monosomies including monosomy 5, monosomy 7 and monosomy 17 and karyotype complexity in patients with MK AML.
In total, 1,592 AML patients who were enrolled between 1990–2008 in four prospective Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer (ECOG-ACRIN) therapeutic trials were included in this study. Cytogenetic data were evaluable in 1,188 patients. Of these 1,188 patients, MK was identified in 195 patients with 93% (182/195) having karyotype complexity (defined as patients with ≥ 3 clonal abnormalities). 87% (158/182) of MK patients with CK had ≥ 5 clonal abnormalities.
In summation, the “prognostic utility of MK+ is limited to those with less complex karyotype (complexity ≤ 4)”. Additionally, the presence of monosomy 17 in can “independently predict worse survival” in MK AML patients.
The presence of a monosomal karyotype (MK+) and/or a complex karyotype (CK+) identifies subcategories of AML with poor prognosis. The prognostic significance of the most common monosomies (monosomy 5, monosomy 7, and monosomy 17) within MK+/CK+AML is not well defined. We analyzed data from 1,592 AML patients age 17-93 years enrolled on ECOG-ACRIN therapeutic trials. The majority of MK+ patients (182/195; 93%) were MK+/CK+ with 87% (158/182) having ≥5 clonal abnormalities (CK≥5). MK+ patients with karyotype complexity ≤4 had a median overall survival (OS) of 0.4y compared to 1.0y for MK- with complexity ≤4 (p<0.001), whereas no OS difference was seen in MK+vs. MK- patients with CK≥5 (p=0.82). Monosomy 5 (93%; 50/54) typically occurred within a highly complex karyotype and had no impact on OS (0.4y; p=0.95). Monosomy 7 demonstrated no impact on OS in patients with CK≥5 (p=0.39) or CK≤4 (p=0.44). Monosomy 17 appeared in 43% (68/158) of CK≥5 patients and demonstrated statistically significant worse OS (0.4y) compared to CK≥5 patients without monosomy 17 (0.5y; p=0.012). Our data suggest that the prognostic impact of MK+ is limited to those with less complex karyotypes and that monosomy 17 may independently predict for worse survival in patients with AML.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox