The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View aml content recommended for you
Chemotherapy resistance and relapse are two of the main causes of death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Thus, the development of novel chemotherapy-free approaches is crucial for these patients. Such targeted antibody-based or cell-based therapies including; chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) and dual affinity retargeting (DART) antibodies.
During the 2019 Society of Hematologic Oncology (SOHO) annual meeting, in Houston, TX, US, two presentations showcased chemotherapy-free approaches for the treatment of AML. Elizabeth Budde from City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, US, presented the current landscape of CAR-T trials for AML1, while, John DiPersio from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, US, spoke about the use of ADCs, DARTs and BiTEs in the clinical setting of AML.2 We hereby provide a summary of these talks regarding the latest updates on these chemotherapy-free approaches for the treatment of AML.
One of the major challenges of CAR-T therapy for AML is the identification of a good CAR-T target, which should only or primarily be expressed by leukemic stem cells, so as to avoid CAR-T cell resistance and off-target toxicities. Such a target is yet to be identified with multiple options being evaluated pre-clinically (i.e. CD7, CD25, CD32, CD38, CD47 etc.). At the moment, the CAR-T constructs that have made it to the clinic target CD33, CD123, NKG2DL or LewisY.1 Some of the ongoing clinical trials using the CAR-Ts mentioned above are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Ongoing CAR-T trials in AML1 CAR-T target Clinical trial ID CAR T cell source Patient age (years) Lymphodepletion CAR-T dose Efficacy & safety CD33 NCT01864902 China Lentivirus 4-1BB Auto or allo 5-90 None in one patient 4.25x108 in one patient One patient with transient blast reduction>50% at week 2The speaker highlighted that CAR-T therapy for AML is still at early stages with multiple ongoing and planned trials worldwide on different molecular targets (Table 1). CD123 and NKG2D targeted CAR-T treatment has led to encouraging early data with regards to feasibility, tolerability and patient responses. As Elizabeth Budde pinpointed, the ways to improve the effectiveness of CAR-T therapies for AML involve the optimization not only of the manufacturing but also the CAR-T design and dosing. Moreover, combination treatments with immunomodulatory drugs and dual-targeting therapies carry great potential for AML patients and should be further investigated.1
To date, there are eight clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of bispecific antibodies for the treatment of AML. These are shown in Table 2.2
Table 2. Bispecific DART antibodies in clinical trials for AML2 * Preliminary data are described below Dual targets Clinical trial ID Drug name Sponsor Status CD123 & CD3 NCT02715011 JNJ-63709178 Janssen Suspended NCT02730312 XmAb14045 Xencor Recruiting NCT02152956 Flotetuzumab* MacroGenics Recruiting CD33 & CD3 NCT02520427 AMG 330 Amgen Recruiting NCT03224819 AMG 673 Amgen Recruiting NCT03144245 AMV564* Amphivena Recruiting NCT03516760 GEM333 GEMoaB Recruiting CLL1 & CD3 NCT03038230 MCLA-117 Merus RecruitingThe speaker presented preliminary data from the phase I trial of flotetuzumab (FLZ), the humanized DART that targets CD3 and CD123 as explained below.
Last but not least, the investigators showed that PD-L1 expression was linked to decreased FLZ activity, as patients who progressed early (< 15 days) had significantly higher PD-L1 expression. Further results are expected the expansion cohort and an additionally planned FLZ plus MGA012 (anti-PD1) cohort.
This is an exciting time for the clinical setting of R/R AML as numerous CAR-Ts, ADCs, BiTEs/DARTs are under pre-clinical and early clinical investigation. With many of these chemotherapy-free therapies showing promising activity and tolerability, it is certain that the future of patients with R/R AML seems more hopeful than ever.
References