The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View aml content recommended for you
Up to the present time, the association between timing of remission achievement and disease prognosis has not been evaluated in contemporary cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with ‘7+3’ therapy. Megan Othus from Public Health Division and SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA, and colleagues analyzed data from patients with AML enrolled in five SWOG trials between 1983–2015 to evaluate the relationship between outcomes and ‘7+3’ reinduction therapy. Data was published ahead of print in Leukemia.
The researchers studied 1,247 patients who received ‘7+3’ in five National Cancer Institute (NCI)/National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) trials conducted by SWOG. The following studies were included in this analysis: S8600 (n = 530 patients, median age = 45 years [15–64]), S9031/S9333 (n = 156 patients, median age = 61 years [56–65]), S0106 (n = 301 patients, median age = 48 years [18–60]), and S1203 (n = 261 patients, median age = 48 years [19–60]).
The doses of chemotherapy regimens varied in these five trials. In S8600, S9031, and S9333, the cytarabine and daunorubicin doses were 200 mg/m2 and 45 mg/m2, respectively, whilst in S0106, administered doses were 100 mg/m2 and 60 mg/m2, respectively. Furthermore, in S1203, ‘7+3’ was administered as follows: cytarabine at a dose of 100 mg/m2 and daunorubicin at a dose of 90 mg/m2.
Those patients who achieved a morphologic CR with the first cycle of ‘7+3’ and also had available MRD data (n = 70) were further analyzed.
This study indicates that early CR achievement after the first cycle of chemotherapy leads to better survival outcomes than two cycles of chemotherapy. These findings not only highlight “the prognostic significance of achieving a remission early but also support the value of MRDneg CR as recently proposed by the European LeukemiaNet as new response entity.”
References