All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2021-08-12T12:45:11.000Z

Sabatolimab for the treatment of poor prognosis myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia

Aug 12, 2021
Share:

Bookmark this article

High-risk and very high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carry poor prognosis for patients despite advances in treatment options. Sabatolimab is a novel antibody that targets T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3), a putative checkpoint receptor involved in regulating both innate and adaptive immune responses. TIM-3 is expressed on leukemic stem cells, but not normal hematopoietic stem cells. Sabatolimab binds directly to leukemic cells, driving the immune-mediated killing of tumor cells, and blocking replication.1

At the 26th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA2021), Andrew Wei and colleagues1 presented findings from a phase Ib clinical trial (NCT03066648), which characterized the safety and tolerability of sabatolimab with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in patients with poor prognosis MDS and AML. The findings are summarized below.

Study design

A phase Ib clinical trial, with the study design shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Study design* 

*Adapted from Wei et al.1

Inclusion criteria

Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) high-risk or very high-risk MDS or newly diagnosed unfit AML patients, ineligible for standard chemotherapy.

Endpoints were as follows:

  • Primary endpoints: maximum tolerated dose; recommended dose; safety and tolerability.
  • Secondary endpoints: preliminary efficacy; response rates; duration of response.

Results

A total of 101 patients were recruited. Table 1 shows basic demographic and diagnostic data.

Table 1. Demographic and diagnostic data*

Characteristic

HR/vHR MDS
(n = 53)

AML
(n = 48)

Sabatolimab + decitabine patients, n

19

22

Sabatolimab + azacitidine patients, n

34

26

Median age, years

70 (range, 23−90)

75 (range, 59−89)

Male, n (%)

29 (54.7)

26 (54.2)

Risk category, n (%)

              High

32 (60.4)

              Very high

21 (39.6)

              Intermediate

19 (39.6)

              Adverse

29 (60.4)

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; HR, high-risk; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; vHR, very high-risk.
*Adapted from Wei et al.1

Secondary endpoints: Safety and tolerability

Of the 101 patients, one patient in the AML group discontinued treatment due to a sabatolimab-related adverse event, and there was one sabatolimab-related death in the MDS group (neutropenic colitis with shock). Only one patient discontinued treatment due to sabatolimab dose-limiting toxicity (hepatitis) (Table 2). Overall, treatments were well tolerated with median treatments in the MDS and AML groups of 8.01 and 6.8 months, respectively.

Table 2. Tolerability and continuation data for treatment groups by condition*

Tolerability

HR/vHR MDS
(n = 53)

AML
(n = 48)

Sabatolimab + decitabine, median treatment (months)

8.02
(range, 0.9−33.5)

6.8
(range, 0.8−30.9)

Sabatolimab + azacitidine, median treatment (months)

3.84
(range, 0.8−17.2)

5.98
(range, 1.1−16.7)

Patients discontinuing therapy, n (%)

39 (74)

42 (87.5)

Reasons for discontinuation, n (%)

              SCT

12 (23)

0

              AE related to sabatolimab

0

1 (2)

              Death, related to sabatolimab

1 (2)

0

              Dose-limiting toxicity

0

1 (3)

AE, adverse event; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; HR, high-risk; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; SCT, stem cell transplantation; vHR, very high-risk.
*Adapted from Wei et al.1

Most of the adverse events were attributable to HMAs alone, not sabatolimab, with 35% of patients requiring a dose interruption, and 1% requiring a dose reduction. The most common events were either hematopoietic-related (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia) or gastrointestinal (nausea, constipation, diarrhea).

In terms of immune-mediated adverse events, only four patients experienced possible treatment-related (sabatolimab) events, leading to dose delay, reduction, or discontinuation.

In terms of clinical outcomes, the overall risk rate was 58% for MDS patients, and 42.5% for AML patients. Further data relating to efficacy and duration of response can be seen in Table 3, including data on duration of response in patients with adverse risk disease (e.g., TP53 mutations, cytogenetic poor risk, and at least one of the TP53/RUNX1/ASXL1 mutations).

Table 3. Clinical outcomes and survival data for both MDS and AML patients*

Outcome

HR/vHR MDS

AML

Overall DOR, months (95% CI)

16.1
(6.7−NE)

12.6
(5.2−NE)

Estimated 12-month PFS, % (95% CI)

50.1
(27.3−69.2)

27.4
(14.5−42.0)

Patients in CR in the intention-to-treat population, %

20

25

DOR in CR, months (95% CI)

21.5
(12.1−NE)

23.0
(1.3−NE)

Mutation

ORR, %

DOR, months

ORR, %

DOR, months

              TP53

71.4

14.7
(95% CI, 6.7−NE)

40

4.2
(95% CI, NE−NE)

              Cytogenetic poor risk

60

12.1
(95% CI, NE−NE)

              At least one of the following: TP53/RUNX1/ASXL1

67.7

16.1 months
(95% CI, 3.0−NE)

53.8

12.6 months
(95% CI, 1.3−NE)

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; HR, high-risk; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; NE, not evaluable; ORR, overall response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; vHR, very high-risk.
*Adapted from Wei et al.1

Conclusion

Overall, the data from this phase Ib trial of sabatolimab with HMAs demonstrate that the combination is well tolerated in patients with poor prognosis MDS and AML. It also demonstrates that complete remission, and durable disease responses can be achieved in both patient groups, including those with adverse risk disease, such as TP53 mutations. Further phase II and phase III clinical trials are needed, and currently underway, to determine what benefit patients with poor prognosis MDS and AML could derive from this treatment combinations.

  1. Wei A, Esteve J, Porkka K, et al. Sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agents (HMAS) in patients (Pts) with high-/very high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR/vHR-MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Subgroup analysis of a phase I study. Oral Abstract #S168. EHA2021; June 11, 2021; Virtual.

Your opinion matters

Do you intend to implement next generation sequencing for measurable residual disease monitoring in AML patients?
0 votes - 5 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox