All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Mutation testing in AML:
What you need to know
with Charles Craddock, Ralph Hills, and Gail Roboz
Wednesday, April 23, 2025
17:30-18:30 BST
This independent educational activity is supported by Thermo Fisher Scientific. All content is developed independently by the faculty. The funder is allowed no influence on the content.
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through educational grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Gilteritinib, a highly potent selective FLT3 inhibitor, is approved as monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated AML. At the 66th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition, Luger presented the findings of the phase II PrECOG 0905 trial (NCT03836209), evaluating the efficacy of gilteritinib vs midostaurin in combination with intensive chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML.1 Eligible patients (N = 177) were stratified by mutation type and randomized 1:1 to receive cytarabine + daunorubicin + gilteritinib (n = 90) or cytarabine + daunorubicin + midostaurin (n = 87) during induction and consolidation.1 The primary endpoint was the FTL3-mutation MRD-negative CRc rate post-induction. Secondary endpoints included CRc, MRD negativity (10−3) by flow cytometry, and survival.1 |
Key learnings |
The CRc (85.6% vs 72.4%; p = 0.042) and MRD-negativity (10−3) rates (64.4% vs 59.8%) were higher in the gilteritinib arm compared to the midostaurin arm. |
The gilteritinib arm had a lower post-induction FLT3-mutation CRc rate than the midostaurin arm (40.0% vs 47.1%; p = 0.366). |
TRAEs were reported in 82.0% of patients receiving gilteritinib vs 75.0% of patients receiving midostaurin, with SAEs reported in 11% and 10% of patients, respectively. |
Among patients who achieved CRc and were FLT3-mutated MRD-positive at the end of induction (n = 27), 83.3% of patients receiving gilteritinib and 44.4% of patients receiving midostaurin were MRD-negative post-consolidation C1 (p = 0.072). |
Findings from the PrECOG 0905 trial suggest that post-induction gilteritinib vs midostaurin plus intensive chemotherapy resulted in improved CRc rate but not mutational MRD-negative rate in patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML. |
Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ASH, American Society of Hematology; C1, first cycle; CRc, composite complete remission; MRD, measurable residual disease; SAE, serious adverse event; TRAE, treatment-related adverse event.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox