All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Kura Oncology, Syndax, Abbvie, Thermo Fisher and Johnson & Johnson. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Oral decitabine/cedazuridine + venetoclax in ND AML: Phase II long-term follow-up

By Megan Moore

Share:

Aug 18, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.


Results from the long-term follow-up of a single-center, phase II study (NCT04746235) evaluating oral decitabine/cedazuridine + venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed (ND) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were older or considered ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC; N = 68) were published in Haematologica by Htut et al. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), defined as patients achieving complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), partial remission (PR), or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS). 

Key data: The ORR was 75% in patients with de novo AML (n = 32) and 58% in those with secondary AML (n = 36); among responders, measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity was achieved in 58% and 56% of patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 32 months, median overall survival (OS) was 12.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1–20.3) in patients with de novo AML vs 7.2 months (95% CI, 3.6–29.9) in those with secondary AML (p = 0.61). Among patients achieving CR or CRi, median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 9.2 vs 11.7 months in patients with de novo vs secondary AML (p = 0.56). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 65% of patients; the most common were thrombocytopenia (15%) and febrile neutropenia (12%).

Key learning: Oral decitabine/cedazuridine + venetoclax demonstrated encouraging response rates in patients with ND AML who are older or ineligible for IC, with a higher ORR in patients with de novo vs with secondary AML. However, there was no statistically significant difference between survival outcomes in patients with de novo vs secondary AML. These data highlight the need for improved therapeutic approaches for patients with secondary AML.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Clinical trials in AML — match patients with relevant trials