All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Roche and Syndax and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
The recent phase III ADMIRAL trial (NCT02421939) of gilteritinib, an oral, highly specific type 1 FMS-like tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated clinical superiority to salvage chemotherapy,1 leading to its approval in the U.S. and Europe for relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, treatment resistance has limited the duration of response to gilteritinib, thought to be due to both on- and off-target mechanisms.1 Catherine Smith and colleagues1 reported results in Blood Advances, on a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based analysis from the patient cohort in the above-mentioned trial, which aimed to:
We summarize the findings below.
Blood or bone marrow samples from the patient cohort in the ADMIRAL trial were collected during study entry and at relapse. Baseline co-mutations in 37 recurrently mutated genes were analyzed in 361 evaluable patients, along with full exon sequencing for FLT3 and mutational hotspots for all other genes. Allelic ratio and gene length were measured in 335 evaluable patients, with median ratio calculated at 0.77. Allelic ratios ≥0.77 were classified as high, and <0.77 as low. Median FLT3-ITD length was 51 base pairs (bp), and patient outcomes were assessed at FLT3-ITD length >51 bp and ≤51 bp.
The patient cohort was categorized into gene subgroups, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Gene subgroups within the patient cohort*
Gene subgroup†, % |
Patients (N = 361) |
---|---|
DNA methylation/hydroxymethylation |
41.2 |
Transcription factors/regulators |
26.3 |
Chromatin-spliceosome-other |
17.4 |
RTK-Ras signalling |
7.8 |
TP53-aneuploidy |
3.6 |
NPM1 |
47.9 |
DNMT3A |
31.9 |
DNMT3A/NPM1 |
23.8 |
WT1 |
18.0 |
IDH1/IDH2 |
15.5 |
*Adapted from Smith et al.1 |
Ras/MAPK pathway gene mutations, which are reportedly associated with gilteritinib resistance, occurred in 6.9% of patients (n = 25/361). No associations between co-mutations and baseline characteristics (age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, cytogenetic risk, or prior treatment with a FLT3 inhibitor) were found.
Across all gene subgroups except TP53-aneuploidy, rates of complete remission (CR) with full or partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were higher in the gilteritinib arm than in the salvage chemotherapy (SC) arm; however, the TP53-aneuploidy category was small (n = 13). Responses to gilteritinib and SC in each of the gene subgroups are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Response rates to the gilteritinib and SC arms across gene subgroups*
CR, complete remission; CRh, CR with partial hematologic recovery; DNA meth./hydroxymeth., DNA methylation/hydroxymethylation; ITT, intention-to-treat population; SC, salvage chemotherapy.
*Adapted from Smith et al.1
Patients treated with gilteritinib had improved median OS compared to those treated with SC, among the following gene categories:
Survival with the gilteritinib treatment was similar in co-mutated and wildtype NPM1, DNMT3A, and WT1 subgroups. Survival in the SC arm was reduced in co-mutated NPM1, and WT1 subgroups compared to wildtype NPM1 or WT-1 subgroups, but was similar in co-mutated and wildtype DNMT3A subgroups.
Table 2 shows the survival rates for patients with single and multiple FLT3-ITD mutations. A total of 280 patients had a single FLT3-ITD mutation, whereas 55 patients had multiple FLT3-ITD mutations with co-mutation profiles similar across treatment arms.
Table 2. Median OS rates according to FLT3-ITD mutation length and multiple mutations*
Outcome |
Gilteritinib arm |
SC arm |
HR |
---|---|---|---|
Patients with single FTL3-ITD mutation at baseline, n |
189 |
91 |
— |
Median OS based on FTL3-ITD mutation length, months |
|||
≤51 bp |
8.9 |
6.1 |
0.807 |
>51 bp |
10.4 |
6.0 |
0.480 |
Patients with multiple FTL3-ITD mutations at baseline, n |
33 |
22 |
— |
Median OS, months |
8.3 |
3.5 |
0.624 |
Rates of pretransplant CR/CRh based on FLT3-ITD allelic ratio, % |
|||
Low FLT3-ITD ratio (<0.77) |
32.7 |
18.9 |
— |
High FLT3-ITD ratio (≥0.77) |
21.1 |
10.0 |
— |
Median OS based on FLT3-ITD allelic ratio, months |
|||
Low FLT3-ITD ratio (<0.77) |
10.6 |
6.9 |
0.795 |
High FLT3-ITD ratio (≥0.77) |
7.1 |
4.3 |
0.49 |
bp, base pairs; CR, complete remission; CRh, CR with partial hematologic recovery; ITD, internal tandem duplication; OS, overall survival; SC, salvage chemotherapy. |
Assessment of FLT3-ITD allelic ratio was performed in 335 patients, who were classified as having either a high (≥0.77; n = 169) or low (<0.77; n= 166) ratio. The CR/CRh and survival rates for both treatment groups are shown in Table 2.
Of the 247 patients on gilteritinib therapy, 75 who achieved composite CR (CRc) subsequently relapsed, and median time from first dose to relapse was 4.6 months. Mutation profiles of the 40 patients with available samples for analysis at baseline and relapse are shown in Figure 2. Overall, 27 of these patients had new gene mutations at relapse, with 18 acquiring new mutations in the Ras/MAPK gene pathway.
Figure 2. Mutation profiles of patients who relapsed on gilteritinib treatment*
*Adapted from Smith et al.1
Ras/MAPK gene mutations were present in 25 of 361 patients with available baseline samples (gilteritinib, n = 18; SC, n = 7).
Overall, patients with a low FLT3 allelic ratio and gene length >51 bp who received gilteritinib had improved remission and survival rates compared to those who received SC. The study1 also confirmed the highly selective nature of gilteritinib and the significant role of the FLT3 pathway, while highlighting the potential of FLT3-targeted therapies in altering mutation profiles over time.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox