All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology and Syndax, and has been supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View aml content recommended for you
Rodrigo Portugal, and colleagues from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), retrospectively studied the outcomes of newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients who were treated with High-Dose (HD) daunorubicin (90 mg/m2). The results of the study were published in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia in June 2017.2
In total, 12 AML patients (median age = 31 years, range 24–60) who were treated with HD daunorubicin (90 mg/m2 on days 1–3) and intravenous cytosine arabinoside (200 mg/m2 daily on days 1–7) between July 2010 – April 2015 at the University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho and the UFRJ were analyzed. The outcomes of patients treated with HD daunorubicin were compared with patients (n = 14) who were treated with Low-Dose (LD) daunorubicin (45 or 60 mg/m2).
In summary, young AML patients receiving induction HD daunorubicin presented with greater incidences of toxic AEs than LD therapy, particularly gastrointestinal and invasive fungal disease.
This retrospective analysis suggests that there is increased toxicity in patients treated with HD daunorubicin. The authors noted that whilst daunorubicin induction dose should be more than 45 mg/m2, according to their analysis there appears to be no clear benefit for a high 90 mg/m2 dose.
The combination of an anthracycline and cytosine arabinoside has been the standard induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for more than three decades. The clinical benefit of intensification of daunorubicin dose to 90mg/m2 has been supported by randomized trials. Based on these promising results, in 2010 we changed our induction protocol of AML, increasing the dose of daunorubicin. Herein, we retrospectively analyzed the treatment outcome of patients treated with high-dose daunorubicin (90mg/m2 days 1-3) and cytosine arabinoside (200mg/m2/day continuous infusion days 1-7) compared with patients receiving 45-60mg/m2 of daunorubicin. Twenty-six previously untreated patients younger than 60 years of age were included. Twelve received high-dose daunorubicin (HD) and 14 the low-dose (LD). Seventeen patients were in CR after one induction cycle. There was no overall difference in complete remission rate between HD and LD (66% vs 64%; p=1.0). Thirty-day induction mortality was 15.3% overall, with a non-significant difference between groups (25% vs 7.1%; p=0.3). Relapses were observed in 9 (53%) patients: 3 (37.5%) in the HD group and in 6 (66.6%) in the LD group (P=0.34). Invasive fungal disease (41.6% vs 0%; P=0.012), creatinine elevation (P=0.001), abdominal pain (33% vs 0%; P=0.033) and need of intensive care unit admission (33.3 vs 0%; p=0.033) were more frequent in the HD group. Four patients in the HD group developed neutropenic enterocolitis (P=0.033). In conclusion, these data indicate that 90mg/m2 of daunorubicin increased the toxicity compared with lower doses.
References
Your opinion matters
What barriers do you encounter when conducting multiple MRD tests during treatment?