All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
How could new treatment combinations improve outcomes in TP53 mutant AML?
Bookmark this article
During the Society of Hematologic Oncology (SOHO) 2021 Annual Meeting, the AML Hub spoke to Naval Daver, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, US. We asked, How could new treatment combinations improve outcomes in TP53 mutant AML?
How could new treatment combinations improve outcomes in TP53 mutant AML?
Daver begins by discussing a recent study that analyzed patients on hypomethylating agents (HMA) versus cytarabine based regimens. He highlights that HMA based therapy maintained better response rates regardless of TP53 variant allele frequency, unlike the cytrabine regimen. He goes on to outline further HMA regimens, such as combinations with venetoclax. He then discusses immune therapies such as magrolimab and their outcomes. Finally, he explains the results of the recent study using APR-246 and the promising activity of natural killer (NK) and NK CAR-T cell based therapies.
Your opinion matters
28 votes - 49 days left ...
Newsletter
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox