All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Roche and Syndax and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
The pivotal phase III, randomized ALFA-0701 study (NCT00927498) compared the safety and efficacy of induction therapy [DA] with daunorubicin (60 mg/m2 for 3 days) and cytarabine (200 mg/m2 for 7 days) plus fractionated doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 7) versus DA alone in patients aged 50–70 years with treatment-naive acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients in complete remission (CR) were administered two consolidations courses of intermediate doses of cytarabine with or without one dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (3 mg/m2 on day 1, maximum dose: 5mg), according to initial randomization.
Two-hundred and eighty patients with untreated de novo AML were randomized 1:1 to receive DA plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO arm, n = 140) or DA alone (control arm, n = 140). The primary endpoint of the study was event-free survival (EFS). Initial results at data cutoff of 1st August 2011, published in Lancet by Castaigne S. et al. in 2012, showed that the estimated 2-year EFS was significantly longer in patients in the GO arm compared to the control arm (40.8 vs 17.1 months respectively, HR = 0.58, P = 0.0003). Although, the CR rates were similar in patients between the GO and control arm as was the treatment-mortality rates.1
The final safety and efficacy data with a longer follow-up (data cutoff: 30th April, 2013) of the phase III randomized ALFA-0701 study was reported by Juliette Lambert from Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France, and colleagues, in an article published in Haematologica on 3rd August, 2018.2 Of the 280 patients randomized in this study, data was reported for 271 patients (GO arm, n = 135; control arm, n = 136).
The authors concluded that the final results of the ALFA-0701 study demonstrate that fractionated doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin added to standard chemotherapy significantly prolongs EFS in patients with previously untreated de novo AML and has an “acceptable safety profile”. This phase III study formed the basis of approval for gemtuzumab ozogamicin in Europe and the United States.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox