All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Roche and Syndax and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
On October 16, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted full approval of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine, decitabine, or low dose cytarabine (LDAC) for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The approval was based on the results of the phase III trials VIALE-A (NCT02993523) and VIALE-C (NCT03069352).1
The VIALE-A trial showed a 34% reduction in the risk of death in patients treated with the combination of venetoclax + azacitidine compared with placebo + azacitidine (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52–0.85; p < 0.001). Median overall survival in these two groups was 14.7 and 9.6 months, respectively. Complete remission was also increased in the venetoclax cohort, at a rate of 37% vs 18%.1 (More detail on the trial results can be found here, including our video interview with Steering Committee member, Courtney DiNardo).
The VIALE-C trial showed an increase in median overall survival with venetoclax in combination with LDAC compared to placebo + LDAC, 7.2 vs 4.1 months (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.52–1.07; p = 0.114), and an increase in complete response rate, 27% vs 7%.1 (More detail on the trial results can be found here. Alternatively, watch our video interview with Steering Committee member, Andrew Wei, for the 6-month update).
Both combinations were well tolerated with manageable safety profiles. In our video interview below, Daniel Pollyea discusses further the utility of venetoclax in the AML setting, including its use in other subsets of patients.
How have venetoclax combinations changed the way we treat AML?
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox