All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The AML Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Does gilteritinib improve outcome post-midostaurin or -sorafenib treatment?
During the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the AML Hub spoke to Alexander Perl, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, US. We asked, Does gilteritinib improve outcome post-midostaurin or -sorafenib treatment?
Does gilteritinib improve outcome post-midostaurin or -sorafenib treatment?
Perl reports the results from a retrospective study evaluating clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory AML treated with midostaurin or sorafenib before receiving gilteritinib in the CHRYSALIS trial and in the ADMIRAL trial.
Related articles
Newsletter
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox