All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Patients with primary refractory, or relapsed, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing a potentially curative allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) require an effective conditioning regimen to optimize their outcomes. Numerous conditioning regimens have been developed in the past decade, however, limited data currently exists which compares these regimens. Therefore, there are little data to guide physicians in determining the ideal conditioning treatment for their patients.
Francesco Saraceni, ASUR Marche, Ancona, IT, and colleagues, conducted a registry-based retrospective study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), designed to compare three currently available conditioning regimens for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML undergoing SCT.
The study compared the conditioning regimens; fludarabine-treosulfan (FT), thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF) and sequential fludarabine, intermediate dose cytarabine (Ara-C), amsacrine, total body irradiation (TBI)/busulfan and cyclophosphamide (FLAMSA), based on various measures of outcome (complete remission [CR] rates, overall survival [OS] rates, non-relapse mortality [NRM], leukemia-free survival [LFS] and graft-versus-host disease [GvHD]-free relapse-free survival [GRFS]).
Given as FT vs TBF vs FLAMSA unless otherwise stated.
Table 1 below shows the key patient outcomes by the conditioning regimen used. It also includes factors associated with each outcome, determined by multivariate analysis. Table 2 shows the engraftment analysis, as well as main causes of death by subgroup.
Table 1: Patient outcomes by conditioning regimen
Factor |
Global population |
FT |
TBF |
FLAMSA |
P value |
Multivariate analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR at day 100 |
Not available (NA) |
92% |
80% |
88% |
0.13 |
NA |
OS at 2-years |
34% |
37% |
24% |
34% |
0.10 |
Inferior OS: Karnofsky performance < 80% (P = 0.01) Patient CMV positive (P = 0.02) |
NRM at 2-years |
22% |
26% |
24% |
20% |
0.24 |
Increased risk of NRM: Older age (per 10 years; P = 0.002) Transplant from mismatched UD ( HLA- 9/10, P = 0.03) |
Death within 100 days |
7% |
5% |
13% |
6% |
NA |
NA |
LFS at 2-years |
27% |
29% |
22% |
27% |
0.28 |
Inferior LFS: Patient CMV positive (P = 0.005) |
GRFS at 2-years |
20% |
23% |
13% |
20% |
NA |
Inferior GRFS: Patient CMV positive (P = 0.05) Karnofsky performance < 80% (P = 0.01) |
Incidence of relapse at 2-years |
52% |
46% |
54% |
53% |
0.33 |
Increased risk relapse: Age at transplant (P = 0.005) Relapsed vs primary refractory AML (P = 0.01) Patient CMV positive (P = 0.03) |
Grade III–IV acute GvHD (aGvHD) |
NA |
10% |
12% |
11% |
0.9 |
Increased risk aGvHD: Transplant from mismatched UD (HLA 9/10; P < 0.001) Transplant from opposite gender (P = 0.045) |
Severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) |
NA |
13% |
19% |
11% |
0.5 |
Increased risk of cGvHD: Donor CMV positive (P = 0.05) |
The use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) reduced the risk of aGvHD grade III–I (P = 0.018) and severe cGvHD (P = 0.005) but did not influence the relapse incidence
Table 2: Engraftment analysis and most common causes of death
|
FT |
TBF |
FLAMSA |
P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Engraftment rate (%) |
98 |
91 |
95 |
0.1 |
Median time to engraftment (days) |
16 |
15 |
14 |
0.02 |
Graft failure (n) |
1 |
1 |
4 |
Not available (NA) |
Secondary graft rejection (n) |
0 |
0 |
6 |
NA |
Total deaths (n) |
75 |
67 |
410 |
NA |
Cause of death: |
|
|
|
|
Original disease (%) |
59 |
40 |
63 |
NA |
Infection (%) |
16 |
27 |
19 |
NA |
GvHD (%) |
10 |
10 |
8 |
NA |
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox