All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Syndax, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kura Oncology, and AbbVie. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View AML content recommended for you
Results from a single-center, single-arm phase II study (NCT03586609) evaluating cladribine (CLAD) + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) + venetoclax (Ven), alternating with azacitidine (Aza) + Ven, in 190 patients with newly diagnosed (ND) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were aged ≥60 years or ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were published in the American Journal of Hematology by Kadia et al. The primary objective was composite complete remission (CRc) rate in the first two cycles. Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall response rate (ORR), treatment toxicity, and induction mortality.
Key data: The CRc rate was 84%, with 75% of responding patients achieving a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). At a median follow-up of 30 months, the median OS was 52 months; 2- and 5-year OS rates were 60% and 45%, respectively. The median event-free survival (EFS) was 50 months. Among patients achieving a response, the median DFS and duration of response (DoR) were 51 months and 51.5 months, respectively. The mortality rates at 4 and 8 weeks were 1% and 3%, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 47% of patients and most commonly involved infectious complications.
Key learning: CLAD + LDAC + Ven alternating with Aza + Ven is an effective and well-tolerated lower-intensity regimen for patients with ND AML who are older or unfit for intensive chemotherapy.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
Which AML-related topic do you currently need the most practical guidance on?