All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Syndax, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kura Oncology, and AbbVie. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View AML content recommended for you
Results from a retrospective analysis of the Beat AML trial (NCT03013998), evaluating the prevalence and prognostic impact of IDH mutations in older adults (aged ≥60 years) with newly diagnosed (ND) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (N = 1,023), were published in Haematologica by Hoff et al. In the outcome-evaluable cohort (n = 1,002), patients received intensive chemotherapy (IC), lower-intensity therapy (LIT), or supportive care/unknown regimens; most patients treated with LIT received hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based treatment.
Key data: IDH mutations were detected in 28% of patients, including IDH1 mutations in 9.7%, IDH2 mutations in 18.9%, and mutations in both IDH1 and IDH2 in 1.0%. Among patients treated with IC (n = 187), IDH mutation was not prognostic for overall survival (OS; p = 0.76). Among patients receiving LIT (n = 705), IDH mutation was associated with longer median OS compared with wild-type IDH (IDHwt; 15.6 vs 10.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–0.78; p < 0.001), primarily driven by IDH2 mutation (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44–0.72). Among patients who received an HMA-based LIT regimen (n = 666), median OS was 16.7 vs 10.2 months for IDH mutation vs IDHwt (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49–0.77; p < 0.001), driven by IDH2 mutation vs IDHwt (18.5 vs 10.2 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.43–0.72; p < 0.001). IDH2 mutation remained prognostic after excluding patients receiving an IDH inhibitor (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41–0.89), while IDH mutation was not prognostic with HMA + venetoclax (p = 0.42).
Key learning: IDH2 mutations confer a favorable prognosis in older adults with ND AML receiving HMA-based LIT, supporting continued evaluation of targeted therapy combinations with LIT regimens in IDH-mutated AML.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content