All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, Syndax, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kura Oncology, AbbVie, and has been supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group.
Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View AML content recommended for you
Results from the randomized, open-label, phase III AMLSG 21-13 trial (NCT02013648), comparing intensive chemotherapy (IC) with (n = 100) or without (n = 102) the multi-kinase inhibitor dasatinib in 202 adults with core binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), were published in Blood by Döhner et al. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS), while secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). The investigational arm received dasatinib 100 mg once daily (QD) on Days 8–21 of induction and Days 6–28 of consolidation, followed by 12 months of single-agent dasatinib 100 mg QD.
Key data: The addition of dasatinib to standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy followed by 12 months of single-agent dasatinib maintenance therapy did not significantly improve EFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63–1.33; p = 0.66), OS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.53–1.63; p = 0.79), RFS (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55–1.21; p = 0.31), or CIR (p = 0.37). Four-year EFS rates were 41% in the standard arm vs 44% in the investigational arm. No significant EFS benefit was observed in subgroup analyses according to KIT mutation status, CBF-AML type, age, or sex. Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred more frequently in the dasatinib arm (64%) than in the standard arm (36%).
Key learning: The addition of dasatinib to intensive chemotherapy failed to improve survival outcomes in patients with CBF-AML and was associated with increased toxicity, questioning the clinical benefit of multi-kinase inhibitors in this patient population.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content