All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Kura Oncology, Syndax, Abbvie, Thermo Fisher and Johnson & Johnson. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Allo-HSCT outcomes stratified by donor type and age in AML/MDS

By Megan Moore

Share:

Oct 14, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute myeloid leukemia.


Results from a retrospective, multicenter study evaluating outcomes of fully human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), stratified by donor type and donor age, in 293 older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) were published in Leukemia Research by Prejzner et al. Outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse-free survival (RFS) at 2 and 5 years post-allo-HSCT.

Key data: Of 293 patients, 221 received matched unrelated donor (MUD) grafts (median donor age 31 years) and 72 received matched sibling donor (MSD) grafts (median donor age 61 years). With a median follow-up of 21 months, 2-year OS was higher in MUD vs MSD transplant recipients (62% vs 47%; p = 0.02), with a trend toward improved 5-year OS (p = 0.07). While relapse rates were similar in MUD vs MSD transplant recipients (31% vs 36%), 5-year RFS was numerically higher in MUD vs MSD transplant recipients (p = 0.08). NRM at 5 years was numerically lower in MUD vs MSD transplant recipients (22.2% vs 30.5%; p = 0.23). In a multivariable analysis, among patients with data on donor age (n = 221), MUD transplants from donors aged <30 years were independently associated with reduced 2-year mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23–0.76; p = 0.004) and reduced 2-year NRM risk (aHR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.06–0.67; p = 0.006).

Key learning: In this retrospective study, MUD allo-HSCT with donors aged <30 years was associated with lower 2-year mortality and NRM compared with MSD allo-HSCT, suggesting that younger MUD may be preferable to older MSD when selecting donors for patients aged ≥60 years with AML or MDS.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.