All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.

  TRANSLATE

The aml Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the aml Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The aml and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson & Johnson, and Syndax, and has been supported through an educational grant from the Hippocrate Conference Institute, an association of the Servier Group. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given.  View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

AGILE: Long-term results of ivosidenib vs placebo in IDH1-mutated newly diagnosed AML

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Sep 5, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute myeloid leukemia.


 

Ivosidenib was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2022 in combination with azacitidine for patients with IDH1-mutated newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and by the European Commission in 2023 for those ineligible for standard intensive chemotherapy, based on the phase III AGILE study (NCT03173248). The AML Hub previously reported findings from AGILE. 

Montesinos et al. published a post hoc analysis reporting long-term results from AGILE evaluating the efficacy and safety of ivosidenib + azacitidine vs placebo + azacitidine in patients with IDH1-mutated newly diagnosed AML in Blood Advances.

Briefly, 148 patients were randomized to receive either 500 mg ivosidenib (n = 73) or placebo (n = 75) once daily, with each group receiving 75 mg/m2 azacitidine for 7 days in 28-day cycles. The post hoc analysis endpoints included overall survival, hematological responses, and transfusion dependence. The median follow-up was 28.6 months.

 

Key learnings

The median OS was longer in the ivosidenib + azacitidine vs placebo + azacitidine arm (29.3 months vs 7.9 months; HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27–0.65; p < 0.0001).

In the ivosidenib + azacitidine arm, hematologic recovery was faster and more durable, with a higher proportion of patients achieving transfusion independence (53.8% vs 17.1%; p = 0.0004) compared with the placebo + azacitidine arm.

Of the MRD-evaluable patients in the ivosidenib + azacitidine arm (n = 33), 30.3% achieved MRD-negativity by D1 C14. In patients stratified by reduction of baseline mutations, the estimated OS was longer in those with MRD <1% vs MRD ≥1% (p = 0.03).

The ivosidenib + azacitidine combination was well tolerated with robust clinical benefit and sustained survival in patients with IDH1-mutated newly diagnosed AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CI, confidence interval; C14, Cycle 14; D1, Day 1; HR, hazard ratio; MRD, measurable residual disease; OS, overall survival.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

When treating a patient newly diagnosed with IDH1-mutated AML who is ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, which initial treatment approach would you most likely consider?