All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Roche and Syndax and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
In January 2018, preliminary data (cut-off date of June 2016) from a dual-stage, non-randomized phase Ib study (NCT02203773), which is assessing the safety and efficacy of venetoclax, a BCL2 inhibitor, in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA), decitabine or azacitidine in elderly patients with treatment naïve acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are ineligible for standard induction therapy were published in Lancet Oncology. The findings from the study demonstrated that venetoclax plus azacitidine or decitabine was well tolerated in newly diagnosed patients with AML who are unfit for standard chemotherapy with promising preliminary efficacy and low early mortality rate.
In a first edition article published in Blood on 25 October 2018, Courtney D. DiNardo from The University Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, and colleagues reported efficacy and safety data (cut-off date of July 7, 2017) from the combined dose-escalation and expansion phases of this study with an extended follow-up.
Oral venetoclax was co-administered at 400, 800, or 1200 mg daily with 20 mg/m2 of decitabine on days 1–5 or 75 mg/m2 of AZA on days 1–7, each 28-day cycle. One-hundred and forty-five patients (median age = 74 years, range: 65–86) received either venetoclax at a dose of 400 mg (n = 60 [29 azacitidine, 31 decitabine]), 800 mg (n = 74 [37 each azacitidine or decitabine]) or 1200 mg (n = 11 [6 azacitidine, 5 decitabine]).
In summary, “the low-intensity regimen of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine demonstrated promising efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in elderly patients with AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy, with a high CR+CRi rate of 73% in the 400-mg venetoclax + HMA cohort, low early mortality rates, and OS extending beyond 17 months”. Courtney DiNardo discusses this study in an interview with the AML Global Portal.
Based on the findings of this study, a phase III study (NCT02993523) which is evaluating venetoclax 400 mg combined with azacitidine in adults with untreated AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy is currently underway.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox