All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Roche and Syndax and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are considered to be in the high cytogenetic risk category if they harbour TP53 mutations of 17q deletions that lead to complete loss of TP53.1 These patients have very poor outcomes and are not generally good candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) due to advanced age or comorbidities.1 This automatically further reduces their potential for survival, as HSCT is a curative option for many patients with AML.1 Mutations in the tumor-suppressing gene TP53 have recently been shown to correlate with increased white blood cell infiltration in various cancers.1 Jayakumar Vadakekolathu and colleagues1 investigated the role of TP53 mutations in forming the immune landscape and microenvironment in AML. The results of this computational study were published in Blood Advances and are summarized below.
Table 1. Patient baseline characteristics1
|
Patient samples |
Genomic database |
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline characteristic |
SAL |
Bologna |
CP-MGD006-01 trial |
TCGA |
|
AML, acute myeloid leukemia; BM, bone marrow; ELN, European LeukemiaNet; HMAs, hypomethylating agents; MAV, mitoxantrone, cytarabine, etoposide; NA, not available; OS, overall survival; SAL, Studien-Allianz Leukämie; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; WBC, white blood cell; WT, wild-type. |
|
||||
No. of patients |
40 |
24 |
45 |
147 |
|
Males/females, n |
26/14 |
17/7 |
24/21 |
81/66 |
|
Age, n |
|
|
|||
0−14 years |
0 |
0 |
— |
0 |
|
15−39 years |
2 |
3 |
— |
27 |
|
40−59 years |
13 |
12 |
— |
45 |
|
> 60 years |
25 |
9 |
— |
75 |
|
Median age, years (range) |
— |
— |
61 (27−81) |
— |
|
Median WBC count at presentation, × 103/μL (range) |
10.55 |
45.0 |
— |
20.0 |
|
Median BM blasts, % (range) |
63.7 |
16.5 |
— |
72.0 |
|
ELN cytogenetic risk group, n (%) |
|
|
|||
Favorable |
0 (0) |
6 (26.1) |
3 (6.7) |
17 (12.0) |
|
Intermediate |
0 (0) |
7 (30.4) |
8 (17.8) |
96 (65.0) |
|
Adverse |
40 (100) |
5 (21.7) |
34 (75.6) |
32 (22.0) |
|
NA |
0 (0) |
5 (21.7) |
— |
2 (1.0) |
|
TP53 status, n |
|
|
|
||
Mutated |
40 |
2 |
15* |
14 |
|
WT |
0 |
22 |
30 |
— |
|
Not tested/not available |
— |
— |
— |
133 |
|
Induction chemotherapy |
|
|
|||
7 + 3 |
5 |
2 |
— |
113 |
|
Fludarabine-based |
— |
8 |
— |
— |
|
Daunorubicin + cytarabine |
21 |
0 |
— |
— |
|
MAV |
12 |
5 |
— |
— |
|
HMAs |
— |
3 |
— |
14 |
|
Lenalidomide |
1 |
— |
— |
9 |
|
Other |
1 |
6 |
— |
11 |
|
Median cohort-wide OS, months (range) |
5.06 |
16.50 |
— |
15.50 |
|
Median number of prior lines (range) |
— |
— |
2 (1−9) |
— |
|
Secondary AML, n (%) |
— |
— |
15 (33.3) |
— |
|
Primary BM samples extracted from the SAL and Bologna cohorts were compared in terms of their immune gene signature (TP53-mutated AML: n = 42; wild type AML: n = 22). Principal component analysis of 770 immunomodulatory genes and cancer pathways were explored to identify those associated with TP53 mutations that may also be prognostic of patient outcomes.
To examine the effect of TP53 loss or mutation on IFN signaling, the KG-1 and Kasumi-1 cell lines were used.
The authors have previously shown that mRNA expression of INF-γ-associated genes, as well as TIS scores, have been associated with patient responses to flotetuzumab. To examine the potential link between TP53 mutations, BM immune signature profile, and complete response to flotetuzumab, the authors examined 45 patients from the CP-MGD006-01 clinical trial. Of those patients, 15 had either TP53 mutations or 17q abnormalities. Immune gene profiling was performed in 13 of these 15 patients with the following results:
The results of this computational study indicate that patients with AML with TP53 mutations have higher levels of immune BM infiltration (especially CD8+ T cells), increased INF-γ-associated signaling, and higher expression of immune checkpoints. A specific gene signature profile of TP53-mutated samples, with overexpressed genes involved in IFN-associated, IL-17-associated, TNF-associated, and other inflammatory pathways were able to predict AML survival outcomes in silico. In vitro, genes overexpressed following TP53 loss of function (IFN-γ signaling molecules) were able to predict poorer survival outcomes. Lastly, patients with TP53 abnormalities who responded (CR) to flotetuzumab therapy had a good OS (10.3 months), indicating the potential use of flotetuzumab immunotherapy in poor risk TP53-mutated AML.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox