All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know AML.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your AML Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe AML Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the AML Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The AML Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The AML Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Kura Oncology, Roche, Syndax and Thermo Fisher, and has been supported through a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Mark R. Litzow from Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, and colleagues conducted a randomized phase II trial to evaluate three novel regimens in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were in first relapse or were refractory to induction/re-induction chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive carboplatin-topotecan (CT), each by continuous infusion for five days, alvocidib, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (FLAM) in a timed sequential regimen, or sirolimus in combination with mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (S-MEC).
Ninety eligible patients with relapsed/refractory AML with >10% bone marrow blasts within two weeks prior to induction randomization were enrolled. Thirty-five patients were enrolled in the CT cohort, 36 in the FLAM cohort, and 19 in the S-MEC cohort. Simon two-stage design was implemented for each of the three treatment cohorts. The median age in the FLAM group was 62 years in comparison with 55 years for the CT and the S-MEC cohort.
The primary objective of the study was the achievement of a complete remission (CR) or a CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi).
This study demonstrated that patients with high-risk AML receiving alvocidib, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone regimen had superior CR rate. In addition, the findings of this study demonstrate that FLAM regimen had an "encouraging response rate" in patients with R/R AML. The authors added that the FLAM regimen should be further evaluated in larger clinical trials but should be administered with caution in elderly patients.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to AML delivered to your inbox